Theos-Talk Archives (July 2005 Message tt00123)

--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "sova7777" <forums@s...> wrote:

> Correct. But this conclusion is based on pretty hard evidence that 
has been shown.

Not hard, but SOFT, for we have only an eletronic text, not a paper 
document.

>> The fact, if it is a fact at all, gives space for several 
theories.

> Now, what is the evidence supporting those theories?

I admit that there are no evidences, exactly as there are no such 
evidences for other theories; for all they are purely speculative, not 
this one only. Yet some theories seem to me not very probable, for 
they imply that there was almost no logic in Leadbeater actions. If he 
was really so naive to lie when there are documents exposing him, it 
crushes other theories which ascribe to him some sophisticated and 
vicious plots. If he really was a designing man, he should take 
trouble to destroy the documents, and he could easily do that, for he 
was a clergyman and could invent some plausible means to penetrate 
into the archives of the church where he was registered.