Re: H.Roerich claims
Jun 22, 2005 06:10 AM
by sova7777
--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Konstantin Zaitzev"
<kay_ziatz@y...> wrote:
> She didn't like that very idea at all:
>
> "And now that we have shown that we must indeed "bid an eternal
> farewell to all the rebellious angels," we naturally pass to an
> examination of the God Jesus, who was manufactured out of the man
> Jesus to redeem us from these very mythical devils..." (Isis, vol.2)
>
> Not only one devil is mythical, but many devils too. Since many
devils
> cannot be antithesis to one God, her expression is obviously
> applicable to the lesser devils, and to H.Roerich's Lucifer in
> particular.
We can interpret this in a different way. Not only the God is
mythical, but the Devil or rebellious angel in any of its popular
versions as well. But if Jesus was a real man, why not that bad guy
HR spoke about as well? Your interpretation versus mine. Who will
prevail? :)
Again, in HPB's texts there is NO mention of such a story as HR told
it, neither positive nor negative.
> Agni Yoga says that Christianity is a culmination all classical
> wisdom;
It's not about various teachings of many churches, it is about the
teaching of Jesus.
BTW, I'm not trying to convert you or uproot your affection towards
CWL or against HR. But this discussion may suggest something to
someone around here and maybe we'll get some new information or
conclusions from bystanders...
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application