Theos-Talk Archives (June 2005 Message tt00203)

--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Konstantin Zaitzev" 
<kay_ziatz@y...> wrote:
> The narration you have quoted shows even more distinctly that Laden 
La 
> and Tibetan are different persons.

It only shows that AAB spoke of them as different persons. The rest 
is questionable. And it's somewhat puzzling why Laden Lha should have 
known Alice Bailey whom he had never met or written to. Well, anyway, 
this historical research is far less important than comparison of 
texts from HPB and AAB which shows their contradictions. To me AAB's 
books seem to be indeed a distraction, probably less dangerous if 
followed than that of CWL, and even quite harmless to those who 
cannot comprehend the language.

Can anyone provide a reference to something in AAB's books that led 
to a practical advancement of readers (like another "invocation" that 
works some wonder or yet another ray system that produces accurate 
predictions) and that is not contained in (or even more interesting --
contradicts) HPB's works? Finding this would probably necessitate 
some reestimation of texts by HPB which are not in line with AAB...