Theos-Talk Archives (June 2005 Message tt00202)

--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Konstantin Zaitzev" 
<kay_ziatz@y...> wrote:
> When some other writer is added, as CWL, for example, there 
> are already two doctrines, for CWL himself no way denied HPB.

Everyone is free to study whatsoever. The point is to show that "some 
other writer", along with giving (mostly by quoting or paraphrasing) 
some valuable stuff which is perfectly in line with the doctrine given 
through HPB, mixes it with tons of rubbish and therefore it's hardly 
useful or even dangerous to some people to dive into this mixture. And 
Daniel et al here make this point quite clear.

And all those suspicious cases of pedophilia, although apparently not 
very criminal, and other weaknesses simply hint at a very probable 
cause of producing that rubbish by the aforementioned writer.

If anyone wants to sieve through his works trying to separate wheat 
from tares, we surely ought to wish this hero lots of luck, for he or 
she will need it desperately.