theos-talk.com

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

"Secrete Doctrine also was far from satisfactory. Read."

Jun 06, 2005 06:42 PM
by Daniel H. Caldwell


Anand,

You wrote:

"Secrete Doctrine also was far from satisfactory. Read."

Then please Anand take your own advice. Read.

Master K.H. in his August 1888 letter to Henry S.
Olcott wrote on THE SECRET DOCTRINE: 

"I have also noted, your thoughts about the 'Secret Doctrine.' Be 
assured that what she [HPB] has not annotated from scientific and 
other works, we have given or suggested to her. Every mistake or 
erroneous notion, corrected and explained by her from the works of 
other theosophists was corrected by me, or under my instruction. It 
is a more valuable work than its predecessor, an epitome of occult 
truths that will make it a source of information and instruction for 
the earnest student for long years to come. . . ." Letters from the 
Masters of the Wisdom, Series I, p. 47 

Anand, I have quoted and requoted this statement from the Master 
K.H. more than a dozen times on this forum and each and every time 
you blissfully ignore the Master's statement and refuse to make any 
comments on what the Master K.H. has said about THE SECRET 
DOCTRINE. Why?

I would understand you ignoring this statement by the Master if you 
were among those who either believed the Masters were fictitious or 
some persona of Johnsonian speculation. But from everything I can 
gather you are a firm "believer" in the reality of the Mahatmas and 
yet for some reason you ignore what the Master K.H. has written 
about THE SECRET DOCTRINE. Why?

Daniel
http://hpb.cc







 

[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application