Theos-Talk Archives (June 2005 Message tt00116)

Morten,
If not - the documented evidence forwarded today
> will keep Leadbeater as an evidence on failure on the Path.
> This seems at least to be a logical conclusion.
> 

It is extremely important for you to know and remember that no 
evidence against Leadbeater was found after thorough investigation. 
And if somebody spreads rumours about some innocent person, attacks 
his character unjustly, then I will consider it my duty to defend 
him and I have done so.

> The documentary evidence against him is just to strong.
> 

There was no evidence.

> And the Krishnamurti versus Leadbeater + Besant split
> will never be healed unless - new - and clear teachings will
> create the proper pieces so to make it all digestible
> to an audience which today - increasingly - find old relics
> (like Leadbeater and Besant) uneatable either to read or talk about.
> One reason is the emotionally related cult they created around 
Krishnamurti.
> This claim of mine I cannot document. But the youth today wants
> new teachings - no doubt there.
> It is of less importance if it is the same - theosophical - 
teaching, but 
> the author has to be new
> and preferably alive.

It is false fear that Krishnamurti reduced credibility of AB, CWL. On 
the contrary he proved that they were right in predicting he would be 
a great teacher. Krishnmurti is considered as very important gift to 
the world from Annie Besant and Leadbeater. Unfortunately some Adyar 
officers have this false fear and so they are removing world-teacher 
references. In my opinion they should not fear about that and keep 
those references.

You quoted Blavatsky's thoughts about Lucifer. Blavatsky's writing is 
so problematic that it should not be considered for any serious 
policy making.

with their policy on the Magazine Lucifer.
> What is your policy Anand ?

As I said earlier Blavatsky's writing is so problematic that it 
should not be considered for any serious policy making. Point Loma 
and ULT followed her policies. Outside California these organizations 
are rejected. I don't want Adyar TS to become local, rejected 
organization by following Blavatsky's policies.

Anand Gholap