theos-talk.com

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: K. Paul Johnson's Arguments Don't Hold Up Under Closer Analysis

May 26, 2005 11:54 AM
by Daniel H. Caldwell


Bart, you wrote:

"Now, Paul will give his standard set of answers, 
you'll give your standard set of replies, he'll 
give HIS standard set of replies, then 
you'll shut up about it for a few months, at 
which point you will post this again.

"Why don't you just pretend you did, and don't?"

Almost every week for the last several years, I
receive an inquiry at my website wanting to know
more about the validity of some of Paul Johnson's
statements about the Masters, etc.

I don't really expect Johnson to address the issues
raised in my post at:
http://blavatskyarchives.com/johnsonparanormal3.htm
but at least interested readers
will be more informed and have access to relevant
material.

I try to constantly keep in mind that:

". . . Contrast alone can enable us to appreciate things at their 
right value; and unless a judge compares notes and hears both sides 
he can hardly come to a correct decision." H.P. Blavatsky, The 
Theosophist, Volume II, July, 1881, p. 218; reprinted in H.P.B.'s 
Collected Writings, Volume III, p. 225.

Daniel









 

[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application