Re: K. Paul Johnson's Arguments Don't Hold Up Under Closer Analysis
May 26, 2005 11:54 AM
by Daniel H. Caldwell
Bart, you wrote:
"Now, Paul will give his standard set of answers,
you'll give your standard set of replies, he'll
give HIS standard set of replies, then
you'll shut up about it for a few months, at
which point you will post this again.
"Why don't you just pretend you did, and don't?"
Almost every week for the last several years, I
receive an inquiry at my website wanting to know
more about the validity of some of Paul Johnson's
statements about the Masters, etc.
I don't really expect Johnson to address the issues
raised in my post at:
http://blavatskyarchives.com/johnsonparanormal3.htm
but at least interested readers
will be more informed and have access to relevant
material.
I try to constantly keep in mind that:
". . . Contrast alone can enable us to appreciate things at their
right value; and unless a judge compares notes and hears both sides
he can hardly come to a correct decision." H.P. Blavatsky, The
Theosophist, Volume II, July, 1881, p. 218; reprinted in H.P.B.'s
Collected Writings, Volume III, p. 225.
Daniel
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application