[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX] |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
May 26, 2005 11:41 AM
by M. Sufilight
Daniel H. Caldwell wrote:K. Paul Johnson's Arguments Don't Hold Up Under Closer Analysis http://blavatskyarchives.com/johnsonparanormal3.htmNow, Paul will give his standard set of answers, you'll give your standard set of replies, he'll give HIS standard set of replies, then you'll shut up about it for a few months, at which point you will post this again. Why don't you just pretend you did, and don't? Bart Yahoo! Groups Links