Re: invisibility Pseudomyms = virtually invisible
May 18, 2005 07:33 AM
by christinaleestemaker
Hallo All, Also my other machine has been blocked through Yahoo, has
something to do with the messanger I think.
Greetings Christina TL.
-- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "krishtar" <krishtar_a@b...> wrote:
> Yes Chris,
> Using nicks it is just like using a "mayavirupa!".
> Feels like being invisible, a siddhi developed exclusively in the
internet technology!
>
> Edson Krishtar ( ok I am losing my invisibility )
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: christinaleestemaker
> To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 5:23 PM
> Subject: Theos-World Re: Pseudomyms s (reply to Krishtar)
>
>
> The only right thing for using a nickname is, that you
are "ünvisible"
> for searchmachines, otherwise I think one person uses nickname
cannot
> take seriously, in cause of the take care off (responsability) of
> his or her writings.
> For now everyone can say "What is a name"?'It belongs to
> personality,individual insight and developement in our TS, so for
> that we don't need to fake a name.
> B.W ChristinaTL.
>
>
>
>
> --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "krishtar" <krishtar_a@b...>
wrote:
> > Thanks for the repply.
> > I confess you, pal, that I exceeded in my past trade of
hostility
> between me and brother Anand and can also add that I fell in the
trap
> of the " trolling-feed" for many times, but it is a limitation
and
> tendecy of personality I am trying to work on...
> > No matter the most we trade and exchange posts and emails here
> we´ll never be able to know anyone deeply enough to understand
many
> of the reasons that move them, so sometimes we angage in
discussions
> which unfortunately and up in aggression and hostility.
> > Lately you are performing here temporary "ombudsman" on my
recent
> posts and I always listen to the other person´s opinion.
> > I also gess that it would make no difference if our trade of
posts
> were under real names instead of nicknames, hostility makes harm,
> creates tensions to any person independent of their real names.
> > I am sure if Anand were nicknamed Mickey or other it would´t
> dimminish his feelings towards so many people who sent him posts
of
> all kinds.
> > Trolls are trolls independent of using nicks or not, IMO.
> > I just chose not to use my true name because as I run a graphic
> design firm in Brasil under my surname, I would not want my name
> publically exposed in search-engines, even less associated with
own
> beliefs which I enjoy sharing only with people of similar
interests.
> > I reveal my name to whomever wants it if I feel there is enough
> friendship between the parts.
> > Regards
> >
> > Krishtar
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: kpauljohnson
> > To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 12:39 PM
> > Subject: Theos-World Feeding trolls (reply to Krishtar)
> >
> >
> > Hey Krishtar,
> >
> > You wrote:
> > > Paul,
> > > Just a funny digression, not serious or hostlility.
> >
> > If it weren't for the past exchanges between you two, I'd
have
> taken
> > it that way. But there does seem to be ongoing hostility,
and to
> > engage the kind of statements Anand habitually makes is
> > called "feeding a troll." Here's a passage about trolls:
> >
> > "Trolls are utterly impervious to criticism (constructive or
> > otherwise). You cannot negotiate with them; you cannot cause
them
> to
> > feel shame or compassion; you cannot reason with them. They
> cannot
> > be made to feel remorse. For some reason, trolls do not feel
they
> > are bound by the rules of courtesy or social responsibility."
> >
> > You are within your rights to respond however you see fit. I
> just
> > want people to be aware of the troll-feeding problem here.
> >
> > > I must also comment the tille of your message " if you
deplore
> > someone´s behaviour don´t imitate it ".
> > > What can we say of so many cartoonists, joke tellers, that
make
> > fantasic and hilarious satires from Bush, Condoleesa, Sadam,
Bin
> > Laden, Prince Charles, Ronaldinho and other public
characters,
> > satires on certain deplorable habits creating a piece of
humour?
> > > Sometimes the inversion of roles in certain statements,
such as
> > the one we are referring to, helps us to understand the
> ridiculous
> > and baseless part of many comments.
> >
> > As I have written before, Jon Stewart of The Daily Show is
> probably
> > the best influence on contemporary American culture, so I
> appreciate
> > your perspective above.
> >
> > At the same time, it is evident that some posters aim primary
to
> > create conflict, and others fall into their trap. At least
Anand
> > does this under his own name. Trolls often foment conflict
under
> > pseudonyms, as theos-talk has witnessed repeatedly.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Paul
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application