Theos-Talk Archives (May 2005 Message tt00118)

You numbskull, without HPB there would have not been anything for AB or CWL to write about.

You wrote
They showed gratitude and humility because she was technically founder. But other senior disciples like Subba Rao dumped SD's draft prepared by Blavatsky.

Well isnt there always a critic, how many years of his life (Subba Row) spend writing it? And by the way, Subba Row? Who?

And AB and CWL paying homage to the source of revenue for the next 100 years!!!! What do you mean by the "technical founder"? Does technical mean that she wrote the whole thesis so that AB and CWL could re-arrange it!

What facts? Have you had a visit from either of them to confirm this?

You're a goose
Cass


Anand Gholap <AnandGholap@AnandGholap.org> wrote:
> The historical fact, mentioned in her "Autobiography", is that it
> The fact that both Besant and Leadbeater wrote many books and tried 
to
> popularize the original teachings, given out to the world by HPB, 
can
> never obscure the fact that it was her - HPB - who was the
> Light-Bringer,

This is greatest delusion. Besant and Leadbeater were themselves
occultists who wrote what they saw and experienced. They did not 
derive
their writing from Blavatsky's writing.


Both AB and CWL, among many others, have always
> maintained that "The Secret Doctrine" is the fountain-source of 
Modern
> Theosophy.

They showed gratitude and humility because she was technically 
founder.
But other senior disciples like Subba Rao dumped SD's draft prepared 
by
Blavatsky.

> You have been ungrateful to a great teacher. You may remember the
> statement by one of the Masters: "Ingratitude is not one of our
vices."

It is not a question of gratefulness or ungratefulness. I am simply
putting facts before you. Facts should not be concealed under the 
cover
of gratefulness.

Anand Gholap







--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "prmoliveira" 

wrote:
> --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Anand Gholap" 
> wrote:
> 
> > I don't think there was any noble motive behind smoking. And 
perhaps 
> > you might try to justify smoking also. 
> > Should we keep ideal of smoking before people. Should we promote 
hippy 
> > culture where people under spiritual practice smoke and do all 
kinds of 
> > ridiculous things. We can not allow sacred science to degenerate 
like 
> > that.
> 
> 
> Wouldn't be easier if you saw HPB's smoking just as a historical 
fact,
> instead of going on a moral rampage about it?
> 
> Was HPB's Teacher, in the passage below, trying to "promote hippie
> culture" and "do all kinds of ridiculous things"?
> 
> "Very kind Sinnett Sahib -- many thanks and salams for the
> tobacco-machine. Our frenchified and pelingized Pandit tells me the
> little short thing has to be cooloted -- whatever he may mean by 
this
> -- and so I will proceed to do so. The pipe is short and my nose 
long,
> so we will agree very well toge[ther] I hope. Thanks -- many 
thanks."
> 
> (http://www.theosociety.org/pasadena/mahatma/ml-71.htm)
> 
> pedro





Yahoo! Groups Links







__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]