Theos-Talk Archives (April 2005 Message tt00154)

samblo@cs.com wrote partly:

<<It was funny and I enjoyed it also
Mauri, >>>

Whatever "it" might be. But, just for 
the record, or in case somebody might've 
been wondering, that accounting about 
the comments from the floor below, etc, 
represented my straight-faced efforts to 
describe what actually happened, or 
might not have happened. I told you 
about all that, John, because of your 
apparently extensive background with 
strange phenomena. Not saying you're 
necessarily the only one out there with 
a background in strange pehonema, on a 
list like this, but ... Anyway, "the 
funny letter," on the other hand, (as I 
think I see it, in a sense ...), was 
SUPPOSED to be, I thought, the previous, 
lead balloon letter, believe it or not, 
which wasn't originally meant to be a 
lead balloon letter at all, believe it 
or not, so much as ... well, not that 
some thoughts of lead balloons might not 
have snuck into my mind during the 
writing of that letter, maybe, but, 
basically ...

^:-/ ...
Mauri

PS I think I might be trying to say 
that some things (like some esotericy 
things ...) might be difficulter to get 
across than one might think. And I 
suppose one might wonder, in some cases, 
maybe, whether/how the nature of one's 
"understanding" of some things might 
have an effect on the nature of one's 
efforts to get some things (like some 
esotericy things, maybe, eg) across in a 
way that might be seen, by some people, 
as close-enough, say, in terms of some 
or some aspects of "intended meaning" 
... (Quotes per variations on themes of 
"understanding" per "karmic/intepretive 
influences" and whatever).