theos-talk.com

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Anand wrote: "I don't recommend writing of Blavatsky for various reasons...."

Apr 05, 2005 08:39 AM
by Daniel H. Caldwell


Anand,

Recently in one of your emails, you wrote:

"...I don't recommend writing of Blavatsky for 
various reasons...."

Can you please state what those various
reasons are?

Furthermore, even though you don't recommend
Blavatsky's writings, the Master K.H. does.

Since you apparently believe in the Master K.H.
and you even quote from some of his letters 
approvingly why do you ignore this recommendation
by K.H.:

"I have also noted, your thoughts about the 'Secret Doctrine.' Be 
assured that what she [HPB] has not annotated from scientific and 
other works, we have given or suggested to her. Every mistake or 
erroneous notion, corrected and explained by her from the works of 
other theosophists was corrected by me, or under my instruction. It 
is a more valuable work than its predecessor, an epitome of occult 
truths that will make it a source of information and instruction for 
the earnest student for long years to come. . . ." Letters from the 
Masters of the Wisdom, Series I, p. 47

Anand, if you revere the Masters as you once wrote to me,
why do you not recommend THE SECRET DOCTRINE especially
since according to KH he worked closely with HPB on
THE SECRET DOCTRINE and even corrected and explained teachings
misunderstood by some Theosophists in this work??

Daniel
http://hpb.cc










 

[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application