Theos-Talk Archives (April 2005 Message tt00138)

Anand,

No, the networking we tried to promote does not mean adopting another 
organization's policies. It means respecting other's differences, 
extending a hand of fellowship, and working cooperatively with others 
who share the ideals of world solidarity. 
If the Adyar TS is not willing to extend fellowship to their sister 
organizations, how can they claim to practice brotherhood elsewhere? If 
you feel that this exclucivism is justified, then how is the Adyar TS 
any different from an Evangelical Organization such as one which 
condemns Catholics, Mormans and Jews merely because they hold different 
beliefs? 
Jerry




Anand Gholap wrote:

> Jerry,
> Policies of ULT and Point Loma TS are not right. If networking means 
> adopting their policies, then it is disastrous for the Theosophical 
> movement. I think Masters also would consider their policies as 
> ridiculous. It is good that TSA does not show much interest in 
> networking with ULT, Point Loma.
> If ULT and Point Loma want to serve the Theosophical cause they should 
> simply declare that they are under Adyar TS, take policies and 
> directions from Adyar management. But it will take huge courage and 
> unselfishness on their part.
> Anand Gholap
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links