Theos-Talk Archives (March 2005 Message tt00641)

--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "M. Sufilight" <global-
theosophy@s...> wrote:
I have not look to that what michael said or wrote, but only to the 
giga work of Dane and I think that is brilliant in the time after HPB.
So what others have to say after that you can forget.
Only look to the autobiography of Dane and his books I can say he 
gives us something more to understand.
And of course you are right to say that the pupil has to be ready for 
the master supports him.
We can not be old enough to learn from the one to the other master 
and so on.
I think, it is a never ending story!
Friendly greetings of Christina





> Hallo Christina and all,
> 
> My views are:
> 
> Thanks.
> It looks as a good contribution from Dane Rudhyar.
> There is certainly some useful content.
> I keep the website in the browser.
> 
> But his (appointed?) keeper of the treasures Michael R. Meyer
> seems to have misunderstood his teachings to a certain extend.
> This is what I get from reading the following.
> http://www.khaldea.com/articles/ni1.shtml
> 
> I am referring to the articles section named: "A New Message for 
the New 
> Century"
> He writes:
> "Future-oriented individuals today do not need gurus and spiritual 
> teachers."
> 
> I have to disagree on that presentation.
> What the students spiritually WANTS - is quite often not, what the 
student
> spiritually NEEDS. There the importance of the teacher arrives.
> But the teacher is only ready when the students is ready.
> The teacher finds the student - it is not the student who finds the 
teacher.
> 
> When the student however truely knows, what it is in Need of, then
> the ideas in Michael R. Meyer's article would have some bearing.
> But this happens so very seldom these days.
> First we need the Future-oriented individuals and students be 
picked out by 
> the relevant teachers.
> Then after some training - Then - first then - they can walk 
themselves.
> 
> I find this view somewhat important to add to his interesting 
article.
> I wonder if Michael is a member of a forum.
> 
> - - - - - - -
> 
> I am a bit sad though to read, that Dane is not referring to the 
Sufis as 
> early exponents of psychology on archetypes
> at http://www.khaldea.com/rudhyar/toohuman.shtml
> 
> Maybe a synthesis or comparison of Dane Rudhyar and Idries Shah's 
writings 
> could be fruitful to undertake.
> Anyone ready?
> 
> 
> Just a few views.
> 
> 
> from
> M. Sufilight
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "christinaleestemaker" <christinaleestemaker@y...>
> To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 5:24 PM
> Subject: Theos-World A remarkable person, theos.history and a lot 
of work 
> done in the spirit of HPB
> 
> 
> >
> >
> > http://www.khaldea.com/rudhyar/bio11.shtml
> > All work you can find on www.khaldea.com.
> > Christina
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >