Theos-Talk Archives (March 2005 Message tt00635)

Hello
I agree with you Mauri.
Sinnet īs chosen path was far from the right one, although as I mentionedI had once expreienced with them too.
Dealing with people and their minds - dual minds still - will always be a new way to get confused, garbled and mind-influenced opinions.
I gess if we have to research with anotherīs personīs mind - being thelast a psychic - we may choose to use our own, because this way you can certify and have your own experience...

Krishtar


----- Original Message ----- 
From: Mauri 
To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 8:41 PM
Subject: Re: Theos-World Who do you believe: Sinnett or Koot Hoomi??





Daniel H. Caldwell wrote:
> 
> Who do you believe: Sinnett or Koot Hoomi??

To me, "believe" seems like a strong 
word in that context, but I think I'm 
tending to speculate along the lines 
that some "esoteric things" might be at 
times somewhat "better understood," in 
some cases, when "speculated about 
conditionally/imputationally with 
possible help/input from intuition, 
maybe," rather than "believed in 
flatly/literally, per se" (as if 
karmic/interpretive influences could be 
magically dispensed with ...) ... So 
while I'm tending to find KH's comments 
generally more interesting than 
Sinnet's, (in a sense, maybe ...), I 
don't see why I should jump to 
conclusions or belief structures about 
"esoteric things" that seem to be 
somewhat beyond my direct/er 
experiences, to begin with. I tend to 
find Sinnet's efforts to "communicate 
with the Masters" using hyphnosis 
somewhat odd inasmuchas or especially 
as/if he knew about the dangers or 
drawbacks that hypnosis might involve 
(among other things ...). A. Cleather, 
for one, might have influenced by 
speculating on that topic.

Speculatively,
Mauri






   
Yahoo! Groups Links



   





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]