Theos-Talk Archives (March 2005 Message tt00630)

Daniel H. Caldwell wrote:
> Who do you believe: Sinnett or Koot Hoomi??
To me, "believe" seems like a strong 
word in that context, but I think I'm 
tending to speculate along the lines 
that some "esoteric things" might be at 
times somewhat "better understood," in 
some cases, when "speculated about 
conditionally/imputationally with 
possible help/input from intuition, 
maybe," rather than "believed in 
flatly/literally, per se" (as if 
karmic/interpretive influences could be 
magically dispensed with ...) ... So 
while I'm tending to find KH's comments 
generally more interesting than 
Sinnet's, (in a sense, maybe ...), I 
don't see why I should jump to 
conclusions or belief structures about 
"esoteric things" that seem to be 
somewhat beyond my direct/er 
experiences, to begin with. I tend to 
find Sinnet's efforts to "communicate 
with the Masters" using hyphnosis 
somewhat odd inasmuchas or especially 
as/if he knew about the dangers or 
drawbacks that hypnosis might involve 
(among other things ...). A. Cleather, 
for one, might have influenced by 
speculating on that topic.

Speculatively,
Mauri