Theos-Talk Archives (March 2005 Message tt00625)

According to the passages that Daniel offered us, there is a small, articlethat I transcribe here:

E.C. once told me:

"Their ( CWL and AB) interpretation at these points were not mayavic ideation, but imprecise in the mentioned periods of time.
CWL and Besant under their researches were tracking down the path of HPB after her physical death.
Mistaked or not, many of these two authors´observations were at leat interesting.
We all kno that HPB was a manifestation of a very special monad whose livesin our earth were inumerous, and always devoted to helping mankind to get rid of ignorance and lack of spiritual wisdom.
During the times she was uncousious and sick she was working in the upper planes with her masters and also preparing details of her next life, and among them was that she was talking in dreams to a young hindu brahmin in south india.
Part of her conscience was being transferred to him for he was still like asub-manifestation of hers. ( I use these terms in the lack of a better terminology) 
If we want to know what or who HPB was later, all we have to do is to studythe life of the young Venkataraman at Thiruvanamalai, much later called "the Sage of Arunachala".
He was born in 1879 and when he reached a certain age, a great modification there happened in his psychic life and it was the time HPB entered his body definitely.
Of course that many ot HPB´s followers and most honest students of Theosophy will find this story too simple, a fantasy and also sensationalist but if one has ever studied this great sage´s teachings and the process he was submitted, the dates and circumstances, in his entire enlighted life, hewill understand that behind this sensational story lies a true jorney of one the enlighted man and women who come to our world, whom the person that HPB represented was one of them ... "


My question is:
Absurd or not...
If what CWL and A. B. were true or half-true, would KH admit it?

Would he permit that a whole race towards " a next HPB´s rebirth " coulddamage and spot all her work and the masters´ ? 

Krishtar


----- Original Message ----- 
From: Daniel H. Caldwell 
To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 12:09 AM
Subject: Theos-World Was Leadbeater & Besant disseminating "a misleading Mayavic ideation"?




In a letter to Annie Besant in 1900, the Mahatma
K.H. wrote:

"The intense desire of some to see Upasika
[Mme. Blavatsky] reincarnate at once has raised
a misleading Mayavic ideation. Upasika has useful
work to do on higher planes and cannot come
again so soon."

Who was responsible for broadcasting this "misleading
Mayavic ideation"?

In 1897, Annie Besant was telling people the
following;

"...Madame Blavatsky has been reincarnated in the
person of a young Brahman, now about nineteen years old."
The Theosophist, May, 1897, p. 498.

Seventeen years AFTER Mahatma KH wrote his letter
to Mrs. Besant, C.W. Leadbeater was still telling
Theosophists the following:

"...Madame Blavatsky lives now in a masculine body,
which she took directly she left the other one. When
she left that body, she stepped into the body of an
Indian boy then about fourteen years old...." Theosophy
in Australia, Sept. 1917.

The above evidence indicates that it was indeed
Leadbeater & Besant who were responsible for 
disseminating what Master Koot Hoomi aptly described 
as "a misleading Mayavic ideation".

Daniel
Blavatsky Study Center
http://blavatskyarchives.com







   
Yahoo! Groups Links



   





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]