theos-talk.com

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Science vs. Metaphysics

Mar 25, 2005 02:45 AM
by leonmaurer


In a message dated 03/11/05 2:56:31 PM, stevestubbs@yahoo.com writes:

>Einstein argued that at the end of the universe space 

>simply ends. That is an interesting little brain teaser, because as 

>Kant pointed out, our brains are so wired that we cannot imaging a 

>wall with nothing on the other side of it. Ditto with time. We 

>cannot imagine a moment which is not followed by another moment. 

>Since it is impossible to test either of those ideas empirically Kant 

>labeled them a priori (i.e., prior to any demonstration or 

>experience) as distinguished from a posteriori contents of 

>consciousness.

Of course, Kant was still looking at everything from the materialist point of 
view. Einstein, on the other hand, saw things correctly by realizing that 
the metric space-time continuum had to end when it transformed into another 
higher order field of fundamental or Absolute Space. His only problem was that he 
couldn't find any physically objective method of proving it. For example, 
how could he measure or calculate the speed of light in the Astral or next 
higher order field phase that the metric space-time continuum resolves into at the 
limit of its expansion? 

>My suspicion is that time and space vanishing completely is a limit 

>condition which can be approached but never arrived at. So that time 

>and space never actually vanish in nature, even in the vicinity of a 

>neutron star, although the contraction in both dimensions may be so 

>severe that the limit is nearly approached. That solves the paradox 

>of where the neutron star's mass is located.

That may be the case from an objective point of view, so long as we stay on 
the physical metric side of the singularity at the center of the neutron star. 
However, if we think about this (configuration or metric) space time 
continuum as originating initially from the "spinergy" surrounding a zero-point of 
Absolute space... We can imagine such 3-D space expanding (changing in time) 
until it becomes so thinned out that it eventually resolves into an infinite 
number of zero-points -- which (since they are dimensionless or non metric) are 
actually in one location of Absolute space touching (coincident with) all other 
potential universes, within universes, within universes, etc., ad infinitum. 
Thus, our metric or linear space ends where another (nonmetric and non linear) 
phase of Absolute Space begins. This phase would correspond with one of the 
seven dimensions of "hyperspace" postulated by string theory. These hyperspace 
"dimensions," also correspond to the seven fold fractally involved fields 
within fields, etc., of the ABC theory and model. 

This resulting "laya point" then, would contain, in the form of its 
surrounding angular momentum or "spinergy" (which we might also call "G-force"), the 
entire mass energy of the universe, along with all its experiential information 
compressed into what Einstein called a "singularity." 

It follows that such a "singularity" must also be at the center of every 
black hole during this expansion of metric space. This conforms with the 
theosophical tenet that the Universe cyclically repeats its Manvantara and Pralaya in 
"time" (which has no dimension other than its variable measure of change) -- 
i.e., in the unchanging zero (laya) point, between manifestations, time rests 
in infinite duration. This corresponds to Einstein's E=mc^2 equation 
indicating that time stops when any object's velocity reaches the speed of light, as 
well as that its dimension in the direction of motion becomes zero. Thus, this 
relativity equation, and its speed of light only refers to this physical space 
time continuum, and is as limited in explaining the higher order nature of the 
hyperspace universe, as Newton's theory of mechanics was limited in 
explaining the relative nature of the space-time continuum.

Analogously, this concept of universal action (during evolution and 
devolution) vs. stasis (at its beginning and ending) would also pertain, analogously, 
to the cyclic life of each black hole vs. its central zero-point singularity an
d its surrounding galaxy, star systems, stars, planets, comets, etc., down to 
the smallest particles of metric matter that compose them all... Each, 
consisting of energy fields circling around their individual zero-point centers of 
gravity. Thus, every individual energy-form would seem to have an analogous 
black hole surrounding and converging to a zero-point "singularity" at its center. 


Thus, we can, in our imagination, look at the universe from its center (which 
is everywhere) outward, or we can look at it sideways or inward from any 
place in it to any other place in it. If we think about that long and hard enough 
we might understand how to resolve the paradoxes (which metaphysical theories 
pose) that what's inside is outside and what's outside is inside, that the 
Absolute reality is both one and many, both finitely and infinitely divisible, 
and all that we experience in each moment of time is nothing but a reflection 
of infinite possibilities of change, ruled by the laws of cycles and 
periodicity inherent in the zero-point, and determined by our karma, while being subject 
to our will... Indicating that consciousness (awareness-will) is the a-priori 
function of the zero-point, while matter is the a-priori aspect of its 
inherent "spinergy" -- visualized as circling "abstract motion" of infinite angular 
momentum on an infinite number of axes. (Of course we can only "visualize" 
this by drawing imaginary lines that are essentially of zero width -- which 
takes some brain bending, and transfer of our zero-point of consciousness from the 
lower order rational mind to the higher order intuitive mind. :-) 

We can also, by these meditative means, comprehend the rebirth of the Cosmos 
(or any other universe within or without it) and the transformations of the 
hyperspace fields, within fields, within fields, etc., of increasingly dense 
("coadunate but not consubstantial") matter, as it emanates from the zero (laya) 
point, initially expands to infinity, while simultaneously involving fractally 
into spherical fields of descending frequency-energy phase orders... All, in 
accord with the "harmony of the spheres" based on the inherent seven fold 
nature of the fundamental cycles of G-force spinning around the zero-point. 

To help with the visualizations of these concepts and paradoxes, see:
http://users.aol.com/uniwldarts/uniworld.artisans.guild/chakrafield.html
http://users.aol.com/leonmaurer/invlutionflddiagnotate.gif
http://users.aol.com/leonmaurer/Invlutionfldmirror2.gif
http://users.aol.com/leonmaurer/BuddhaBabyGordianKnot.gif
http://users.aol.com/leonmaurer/TaiChiFldDiag-figure-2.gif
http://users.aol.com/leonmaurer/Chakrafielddiag-fig.col.jpg
http://tellworld.com/Astro.Biological.Coenergetics 

Lenny

 

[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application