Theos-Talk Archives (March 2005 Message tt00278)

a great part of the H.P.B a great betrayal deals with the court case
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/messages/22498

--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Alaya" <lalaya7@y...> wrote:
> 
> "If CWL was really a pedophile, why there was no any legal 
percecution
> anf court decision against him?"
> 
> there is one of 1906
> just take a look on the tesminonial of A.L.C and other in her book, 
i 
> posted it last month
> 
> --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Konstantin Zaitzev" 
> <kay_ziatz@y...> wrote:
> > 
> > --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, Cass Silva <silva_cass@y...> 
> wrote:
> > 
> > > Dear Perry
> > > The Beuracracy has established its point, in its opinioncy on
> > 
> > 
> > R. Burnier wrote:
> > 
> > > A number of your statements are based on incomplete information 
> or 
> > > no knowledge, for instance the accusation of his being a 
> pedophile. 
> > 
> > It's two quite different issues. If R. Burnier is a beauraucrate, 
> it 
> > doesn't prove that CWL was a pedophile. And in the contrary, if 
he 
> > wasn't a pedophile it doesn't mean that his works are in full 
> > consistency with those of HPB. And R. Burnier doesn't deny these 
> > descrepances in her message.
> > 
> > If CWL was really a pedophile, why there was no any legal 
> percecution 
> > anf court decision against him? 100 years ago homosexuality was 
> > condemned (and persecuted in most counties), even it was 
practiced 
> > quite apart from pedophilia. And if so happened that there was no 
> laws 
> > against pedophilia, an anti-gay law could be applied.