Theos-Talk Archives (March 2005 Message tt00277)

"If CWL was really a pedophile, why there was no any legal percecution
anf court decision against him?"

there is one of 1906
just take a look on the tesminonial of A.L.C and other in her book, i 
posted it last month

--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Konstantin Zaitzev" 
<kay_ziatz@y...> wrote:
> 
> --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, Cass Silva <silva_cass@y...> 
wrote:
> 
> > Dear Perry
> > The Beuracracy has established its point, in its opinioncy on
> 
> 
> R. Burnier wrote:
> 
> > A number of your statements are based on incomplete information 
or 
> > no knowledge, for instance the accusation of his being a 
pedophile. 
> 
> It's two quite different issues. If R. Burnier is a beauraucrate, 
it 
> doesn't prove that CWL was a pedophile. And in the contrary, if he 
> wasn't a pedophile it doesn't mean that his works are in full 
> consistency with those of HPB. And R. Burnier doesn't deny these 
> descrepances in her message.
> 
> If CWL was really a pedophile, why there was no any legal 
percecution 
> anf court decision against him? 100 years ago homosexuality was 
> condemned (and persecuted in most counties), even it was practiced 
> quite apart from pedophilia. And if so happened that there was no 
laws 
> against pedophilia, an anti-gay law could be applied.