Theos-Talk Archives (March 2005 Message tt00260)

Dear Konstantin
I wasnt trying to link the two. Her tone in this letter is a confirmation that she is less concerned with the theosophical members than she is with seeing the truth. She knows, better than anyone the facts of the matter as she inherited them from the past. There is plenty documentation regarding his sexual perversion, was he taken to court in Australia for no reason, or is she saying that all the accusations against him were false and he was the victim. Please. If she has these facts then why doesnt she publish them and clear his name?
Cass


Konstantin Zaitzev <kay_ziatz@yahoo.com> wrote:


--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, Cass Silva wrote:

> Dear Perry
> The Beuracracy has established its point, in its opinioncy on


R. Burnier wrote:

> A number of your statements are based on incomplete information or 
> no knowledge, for instance the accusation of his being a pedophile. 

It's two quite different issues. If R. Burnier is a beauraucrate, it 
doesn't prove that CWL was a pedophile. And in the contrary, if he 
wasn't a pedophile it doesn't mean that his works are in full 
consistency with those of HPB. And R. Burnier doesn't deny these 
descrepances in her message.

If CWL was really a pedophile, why there was no any legal percecution 
anf court decision against him? 100 years ago homosexuality was 
condemned (and persecuted in most counties), even it was practiced 
quite apart from pedophilia. And if so happened that there was no laws 
against pedophilia, an anti-gay law could be applied.






Yahoo! Groups Links








__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]