Theos-Talk Archives (March 2005 Message tt00200)

samblo@cs.com wrote:

<<Mauri,
No, it was not remote viewing, the 
individual was in a state of altered
consciousness with the context that his 
personality is stepped aside while
another utilized his body mechanisms to 
deliver speech or write content. >>

To me that kind of thing sounds similar 
to the way that "Seth" was channeled by 
Jane Roberts.

<<While in the projection state his 
eyeballs are rolled up so that one 
cannot see any of the iris of the eye, 
only the white of the eye is seen. >>

I don't remember reading anything like 
that in the Jane Roberts books.

<<not withstanding this delimiting of 
vision he draws and writes with 
precision of a draftsman. There were 
over 400 hours of audio tape recordings 
as also 5000 ft. of professional
movie film taken in color on a Clair 
Movie Camera and many rolls of 35mm 
color photo's. James E. Frazier entered 
into a life-rights agreement with the
experiencer back in 1975 and has all the 
original archival proofs. It is a very
involved complex overall process that is 
contained of several distinct phase
periods in this persons life from age 16 
to 33 years and still ongoing today 27
years later. In a very loose way 
"remote" could also be the use of 
another alternate persona as a remote 
source to deliver a communication. But 
it is not his normative conscious 
personality that is producing the 
content as he has no known knowledge 
base from which he has had exposure or 
memory to produce the content. Nothing 
wrong with speculating, I have done that 
a lot in regard to his case.
John>>>>.

Are there transcripts of those sessions 
available to the public? Having read a 
fair number of experiencer cases over 
the years, I'm wondering what else might 
be out there (though I have begun to 
question or wonder about the 
context/perspective or interpretive 
versions that experiencers, in general, 
might be seen to represent).

Speculatively,
Mauri