Theos-Talk Archives (February 2005 Message tt00504)

Hi Perry,

 

I must think about it more carefully, but in principle I believe such articles should be allowed to be published in official society publications. However two topics arise here:

- Are these articles disallowed to be published? I think if any member writes one article of this kind with the correct spirit, he won’t find obstacles to publishes it.

- There is a danger of falling in a lot of discursive argues that never-ending, spreading confrontation and so on.

 

Obviously, Adyar TS doesn’t consider writings of Leadbeater, Besant, Taimni, Krishnamuti, etc., as “Neo Theosophy” because Adyar refuse to admitBlavatsky teachings (or any other) as the official ones or THE Theosophy. So, entering in that topics it could seem more an attempt of demonstrates their validity -in detriment of other approaches- rather than an opening willingness to investigate that matters. (I fear that grammar of this last sentence –if not that of the entire text– is terrible, sorry).

I agree with your words, specially that “Being told there is no problem and everything is ok to me means ignoring certain fundamental hypocrisies and I can't just ignore them”.

But this is not a simple topic if one wants to produce genuine sake for thetheosophical movement, and every action must be pondered, especially if you have a wide influence. 

Best regards

p

__________________________________________________
Correo Yahoo!
Espacio para todos tus mensajes, antivirus y antispam ¡gratis! 
¡Abrí tu cuenta ya! - http://correo.yahoo.com.ar

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]