Theos-Talk Archives (February 2005 Message tt00479)

--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "krishtar" <krishtar_a@b...> wrote:
> Cass and Konstantin.

> I had tried to read Krishnamurti some time ago but he doesn´t 
transmit goodness and joy, he sounds bitter and empty sometimes.

If he even had overshadowing he could lose it later.
An opinion of an Ingian guru:

Sri Jiddu Krishnamurti teaches the same doctrine. It is ageless. He 
got it from the Masters. He got the experience of it. He gives the 
experience to the people around him. 

But he clearly bluffs that the Gurus and the books are not necessary. 
At the same time he is working as Guru. He says, no Guru is required 
and no teaching is required. This is the teaching he has been doing 
for the past fifty years. So he is a thorough failure, not in 
experiencing or teaching or giving the thing to the necessary people, 
but his own principle is wrong because what he does, he never speaks. 
He bluffs and misrepresents things. That is, what Jiddu Krishnamurti 
says. He denies the Masters or Gurus. He denies the scriptures. He 
denies sacred books, — their need. 

Meanwhile a disciple asked Master E.K. whether such behaviour can be 
found in the horoscope.
Master replied negatively, "It cannot be because this is beyond 
horoscope. Spiritual training after a certain level goes beyond 
horoscope. Either success or failure cannot be gazed through 
horoscope.

(E. Krishnamacharya. 1984 lectures published under the title "Occult 
anatomy")