Theos-Talk Archives (February 2005 Message tt00089)

Many thanks John, reassuring to know that what will be will be, I guess there is no point in worrying about it. 
Cass

samblo@cs.com wrote:

Cass,
Well as far as i have read Madame Blavatsky did not say anything about 
Nibiru, Phaeton or Nemisis in her day as is a current topic of some websites nd 
forum chat threads. A lot has been made about Zacheria Sitchin's Books that 
caught the public readership in the last two decades. Pavel Smutny on his 
websites has a most complex and original theory but to my knowledge so far 
Astronomers have not admitted to any thing as a discovery in our Solar System at 
present, even using the Deep Space Outpost assets we have. As I tried to indicate 
there is at least one record that remains of such an encounter long in the past, 
only because it was buried in a flood plain 12,000 feet up in the Andes, but 
Academia has not validated either Posnansky or Bellamy and Allen in their 
works like many others.

The one thing Madame Blavatsky did mention that I remember is that there 
are periods in which the Earth has no Moon and then periods when a Moon is 
present. I don't recall if she detailed an explanation of how they arrived in 
fixed Earth Orbit or how they came to cease to exist physically or any effects 
they came to create in either case.
Pavel Smutnys research indicates that a wanderer planet or planetoid has 
for many Solar years transited our Solar System, 18 times every 25,920 years, 
it is in only about 4-5 transits that there is any close approach to the orbit 
of the earth, and in only three of those is it close enough to cause 
significant effects or worse here. Pavel Smutny where he speaks about Nemisis 
sescribes similar to what you ask about in that Nemisis is a type of solar system with 
it's own entrained satellites. In his calculations in regard to "Planet X" he 
calculates that from the time it is inside the orbital distance of Saturn 
ittakes 6 months to tranist the inner Planets.

Personally I do not subscribe to anchoring my perspective to Biblical 
limitations as it is very constrictive and inhibitatory to some one single set of 
parameters or possibilities. I also do not agree with the Pole Shift clamor 
since the era of the 1960's. Look at the Gtreat Pyramid. It's precision design 
incorporates certain archetechual features such as precision pathways from 
inside to the outside and these pathways were precision aligned to be sighted to 
specific stars tht have always since the Great Pyramid was built been intended 
to be allowed to cast their dim light into and down these pathways. Sirius, 
Castor and Pollux I seem to remember. If any significant Pole shift had 
occurred as some claim happened then it would be complately impossible for this 
sighting pathways to be operative today in any shape manner of form at least dating 
from the time the Great Pyramid was built. the 2012 AD date gained 
popularity in the 1980's due to Jose Arguelles publishing hie book "The Mayan Factor - 
Path Beyond Technology" in 1987, he had folow on Books later. The single thing 
that most people insist upon disregarding it that thought the Calendar 
culminates a Grand Mayan Calendar Cycle time and existance continues on with the 
calendar automaticallt self-creating a new "Ahua Cycle." The Earth goes on and 
the Calendar continues. I ahve read a lot of things that were "add-ons" by 
others who climbed on the calendar band wagon. Terence McKenna published an 
interesting "Time Forms" Website that was closely associated with Arguelles Books 
content regards the date 2012 AD. We all have birthdays which is a periodic cycle 
where we enjoy ourselves. the Mandaeans ended their works with "And Life is 
Victorious!" This is because it is true no matter what happens.

Oh, and continueing to read the earlier reference post, I recall Blavatsky 
had diagrams of two esoteric Planets, Phoebe and another I don't remember at 
the moment, maybe Daniel or Dallas will. I think personally the weather 
changes are more directly related to on the Earth changes of the atmospheric 
compositions by both man-made and natural causations. A few days ago I read a News 
Bulletin about new findings that show an increase in mean tmeperature by the 
end of this century of up to 11.5 degree's centigrade, which is huge in terms of 
it's climatic consequences.

John 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




Yahoo! Groups Links









---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]