Theos-Talk Archives (January 2005 Message tt01066)

Hi friends and specially for the reply from mr. Coles.

I was thinking to myself about the reasons for which we so insistently dig here and dig over there the first theosophists´ rumours and historical behaviours.
In my personal situation I am looking for clues to find the best sources tostudy theosophy, since there are -- I never knew before I participated inthis forum -- many theosophists who claimed to make contact with KH, M andothers whose names were not divulged.
It is easy to see how false are certain books from, for example, Claire Prophet and their discipleships, but sometimes it is not that evident.
The books and teachings from these more recent authors ( such as Hodson, CWL. and others ) show much inconsistences and I agree that for beginners whowant to scape, as example, from the Allan Kardec line, suddently get exposed to books that teaches the same occult principle with totally different approaches, it becomes a trap
The biggest importance of the forum, Mr. Eldon, is that the newcomers may find in it many clues to separate what is worth and what is not.
Only when a competitive approach among the participants raises up, generating arrogancy, I don´t appreciate and it is something that I shared with you when you posted last week .
We are all here to learn and to pass on something that may help.

Krishtar

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]