Theos-Talk Archives (January 2005 Message tt00642)

Jan 20 2005

Dear Friends:


May I break in and offer a few remarks? 


If a distinction is made in separating THEOSOPHY (its teachings, doctrines,
and basic tents -- as rules, laws and history of Nature, our World and
Universe) from any vehicle devised for its promotion: such as a
THEOSOPHICAL SOCIETY, etc... the problem fades.

No "body" of any dimension can "own" THEOSOPHY !

No "body" ought to constrain any one to some outside rules, however great or
wise, unless the Inner MASTER, the individual HIGHER SELF (ATMA ) permits
and approves. This single idea is a very deep, but also a universal one, as
the ATMA is a universal principle -- an immutable background to all. 

Every member, or independent student of THEOSOPHY, is free to use and apply
his time, and make a study of THEOSOPHY with a view to personal application.
In this there are no constraints. 

Joining any organization or association makes no change in the individual's
responsibility to his HIGHER SELF. Every ancient teaching says this.

The mere fact of joining makes no difference karmically, and in itself
confers no benefits, unless one devotes ones' self to THEOSOPHY and its
self - application and promulgation. If we read HPB's The KEY TO THEOSOPHY
(not an abridged version) this is made clear.

Where do we find THEOSOPHY ? In the original and unedited writings of HPB.


Next question: do we study them?   

Can we determine what are the basic rules for individual progress? 

I would say that our best guides are The KEY TO THEOSOPHY and The VOICE OF
THE SILENCE .

Once we have grasped their meaning and intent we can go to the SECRET
DOCTRINE, to ISIS UNVEILED, and to HPB's articles, and secure the next
"meals." 

Other than this, it might be a good idea to read again what HPB says:

----------------------------------------

SHE BEING DEAD YET SPEAKETH

Article includes statements by H. P. Blavatsky

[In the will of the late H. P. Blavatsky was made the request that her
friends should assemble on the anniversary of her death and read passages
from the Bhagavad-Gita and the Light of Asia. This was accordingly done on
May 8th, in Adyar, London, New York, and other places. In New York, among
other interesting items reported at the time, Mrs. J. Campbell Keightley
read, after a few introductory remarks, extracts from the private letters of
H.P.B. In response to many requests we print these as follows. The remarks,
being extemporaneous, are quoted from memory. [1892] ]

MR. PRESIDENT, FRIENDS: 

This being the first occasion upon which I have ever spoken in public, I
will ask you to condone my inexperience while I make a few remarks upon the
extracts chosen from the letters of Madame Blavatsky to a few friends.
 
In regard to Mme. Blavatsky, the world, to use a phrase of Charles Lamb, was
"the victim of imperfect sympathies." It failed to know her; that failure
was its own great loss. Among the many accusations flung at her was one
which, at the last ditch, it never failed to make; it said that Mme.
Blavatsky had no Moral Ideal. This was false. 

She had this ideal; she had also the Eastern reverence for an ideal--a
reverence to the Western world unknown. We might hence expect to find her
teaching that Ideal to a great extent under the privacy of a pledge, and
there are indications of this in all that has been published concerning the
Esoteric School. That her ideal was ever present to her mind and heart these
extracts from private letters to her friends will show. 

Her main teachings can be reduced to the following propositions: 

That Morals have a basis in Law and in fact. 

That Moral Law is Natural Law. 

That Evolution makes for Righteousness. 

That the "fundamental identity of all souls with the Oversoul" renders moral
contagion possible through the subtle psychic medium. 

That the Spiritual Identity of all Being renders Universal Brotherhood the
only possible path for truth-seeking men. 

She distrusted the appeal to sentiment. She saw that existing religions fail
in it; that modern civilization frustrates it; that emotionalism is no basis
for the Will which annuls all temptations of the flesh, and the Faith which
shall make mountains move. 

Hence she taught the scientific aspect and bearing of sin. Taught that
Universal Law, in every department, rigidly opposes and avenges the
commission of sin, showing the free will of man counterbalanced by the
declaration "Vengeance is mine, saith the Law; I will repay." She taught
that the awful responsibility of the occultist, extending down to the least
atom of substance, forever forbade our asking that question of Cain which we
do ask daily--"Am I my Brother's keeper?" She taught that the deep reply
reverberated down the ages, as we may read it in our bibles: "What hast thou
done? The voice of thy brother's blood crieth to me from the ground." 

Justice she taught, and the true discrimination of it; Mercy, too, and Love.
She wrote of one: "He has developed an extraordinary hatred to me, but I
have loved him too much to hate him." Above all she taught that "the pure in
heart see God"; taught it as a scientific fact; showed it to be, so to say,
materially as well as spiritually possible through the spiritual laws
working in the one Substance, and, in the showing, lifted our courage higher
than the visible stars. 

The first of these extracts from H.P.B.'s letters is dated Nov. 29, 1878,
and is interesting from the fact that it speaks of the original institution
of three degrees of the T.S., a fact often disputed in these later days. 
____________

YOU will find the aims and purposes of the Theosophical Society in the two
enclosed circulars. It is a brotherhood of humanity, established to make
away with all and every dogmatic religion founded on dead-letter
interpretation, and to teach people and every member to believe but in one
impersonal God; to rely upon his (man's) own powers; to consider himself his
only saviour; to learn the infinitude of the occult psychological powers
hidden within his own physical man; to develop these powers; and to give him
the assurance of the immortality of his divine spirit and the survival of
his soul; to make him regard every man of whatever race, color, or creed,
and to prove to him that the only truths revealed to man by superior men
(not a god) are contained in the Vedas of the ancient Aryas of India.
Finally, to demonstrate to him that there never were, will be, nor are, any
miracles; that there can be nothing 'supernatural' in this universe, and
that on earth, at least, the only god is man himself. 

"It lies within his powers to become and to continue a god after the death
of his physical body. Our society receives nothing the possibility of which
it cannot demonstrate at will. We believe in the phenomena, but we
disbelieve in the constant intervention of 'spirits' to produce such
phenomena. We maintain that the embodied spirit has more powers to produce
them than a disembodied one. We believe in the existence of spirits, but of
many classes, the human spirits being but one class of the many. 

"The Society requires of its members but the time they can give it without
encroaching upon that due to their private affairs. There are three degrees
of membership. It is but in the highest or third that members have to devote
themselves quasi entirely to the work of the T.S. . . . 

"Everyone is eligible, provided he is an honest, pure man or woman, no free
lover, and especially no bigoted Christian. We go dead against idolatry, and
as much against materialism." 

"Of the two unpardonable sins, the first is Hypocrisy--Pecksniffianism.
Better one hundred mistakes through unwise, injudicious sincerity and
indiscretion than Tartuffe-like saintship as the whitened sepulchre, and
rottenness and decay within. . . . This is not unpardonable, but very
dangerous, . . . doubt, eternal wavering--it leads one to wreck. . . . One
little period passed without doubt, murmuring, and despair; what a gain it
would be; a period a mere tithe of what every one of us has had to pass
through. But every one forges his own destiny." 

"Those who fall off from our living human Mahatmas to fall into the
Saptarishi--the Star Rishis, are no Theosophists." 

"Allow me to quote from a very esoterically wise and exoterically foolish
book, the work and production of some ancient friends and foes: 'There is
more joy in the Kingdom of Heaven for one repentant sinner than for
ninety-nine saints.' . . . Let us be just and give to Caesar what is
Caesar's, however imperfect, even vicious, Caesar may be. 'Blessed be the
peacemakers,' said another old adept of 107 years B.C., and the saying is
alive and kicks to the present day amongst the MASTERS." 

"The Esoteric Section is to be a School for earnest Theosophists who would
learn more (than they can from published works) of the true Esoteric tenets.
. . . There is no room for despotism or ruling in it; no money to pay or
make; no glory for me, but a series of misconceptions, slanders, suspicions,
and ingratitude in almost an immediate future: 1 but if out of the . . .
Theosophists who have already pledged themselves I can place on the right
and true path half a dozen or so, I will die happy. 

Many are called, few are chosen. Unless they comply with the lines you speak
of, traced originally by the Masters, they cannot succeed. (2) I can only
show the way to those whose eyes are open to the truth, whose souls are full
of altruism, charity, and love for the whole creation, and who think of
themselves last. The blind . . . will never profit by these teachings. 

They would make of the 'strait gate' a large public thoroughfare leading not
to the Kingdom of Heaven, now and hereafter, to the Buddha-Christos in the
Sanctuary of our innermost souls, but to their own idols with feet of clay.
. . . 

The Esoteric Section is not of the earth, earthy; it does not interfere with
the exoteric administration of Lodges; takes no stock in external Theosophy;
has no officers or staff; needs no halls or meeting rooms. . . . Finally, it
requires neither subscription fees nor money, for 'as I have not so received
it, I shall not so impart it,' and that I would rather starve in the gutter
than take one penny for my teaching of the sacred truths. . . . 

Here I am with perhaps a few years or a few months only (Master knoweth) to
remain on earth in this loathsome, old, ruined body; and I am ready to
answer the call of any good Theosophist who works for Theosophy on the lines
traced by the Masters, and as ready as the Rosicrucian pelican to feed with
my heart's blood the chosen 'Seven.' He who would have his inheritance
before I die . . . let him ask first. What I have, or rather what I am
permitted to give, I will give." 

"Many are called but few are chosen. Well, no need breaking my heart over
spilt milk. Come what may, I shall die at my post, Theosophical banner in
hand, and while I live I do fervently hope that all the splashes of mud
thrown at it will reach me personally. At any rate I mean to continue
protecting the glorious truth with my old carcass so long as it lasts. And
when I do drop down for good, I hope in such Theosophists as . . . and . . .
to carry on the work and protect the banner of Truth in their turn. Oh, I do
feel so sick at heart in looking round and perceiving nothing save
selfishness, personal vanity, and mean little ambitions. 

What is this about 'the soldier not being free'? (3) Of course no soldier
can be free to move about his physical body wherever he likes. But what has
the esoteric teaching to do with the outward man? A soldier may be stuck to
his sentry box like a barnacle to its ship, and the soldier's Ego be free to
go where it likes and think what it likes best. 

No man is required to carry a burden heavier than he can bear; nor do more
than it is possible for him to do. A man of means, independent and free from
any duty, will have to move about and go, missionary-like, to teach
Theosophy to the Sadducees and the Gentiles of Christianity. 

A man tied by his duty to one place has no right to desert it in order to
fulfill another duty, let it be however much greater; for the first duty
taught in Occultism is to do one's duty unflinchingly by every duty. Pardon
these seemingly absurd paradoxes and Irish Bulls; but I have to repeat this
ad nauseam usque for the last month. 'Shall I risk to be ordered to leave my
wife, desert my children and home if I pledge myself?' asks one. 'No,' I
say, 'because he who plays truant in one thing will be faithless in another.


No real, genuine MASTER will accept a chela who sacrifices anyone except
himself to go to that Master.' If one cannot, owing to circumstances or his
position in life, become a full adept in this existence, let him prepare his
mental luggage for the next, so as to be ready at the first call when he is
once more reborn. 

What one has to do before he pledges himself irretrievably is, to probe
one's nature to the bottom, for self-discipline is based on self-knowledge.
It is said somewhere that self-discipline often leads one to a state of
self-confidence which becomes vanity and pride in the long run. I say,
foolish is the man who says so. This may happen only when our motives are of
a worldly character or selfish; otherwise, self-confidence is the first step
to that kind of WILL which will make a mountain move: 

" 'To thine own self be true, and it must follow, as the night the day, thou
can'st not then be false to any man.' 

"The question is whether Polonius meant this for worldly wisdom or for
occult knowledge; and by 'own self' the false Ego (or the terrestrial
personality) or that spark in us which is but the reflection of the 'One
Universal Ego.' 

"But I am dreaming. I had but four hours' sleep. . . . Give my sincere,
fraternal respects to . ., and let him try to feel my old hand giving him
the Master's grip, the strong grip of the Lion's paw of Punjab (not of the
tribe of Judah) across the Atlantic. To you my eternal affection and
gratitude. 

Your H.P.B."


"To live like cats and dogs in the T.S. is positively against all rules--and
wishes of 'the Masters,' as against our Brotherhood-- so-called--and all its
rules. THEY are disgusted. THEY look on, and in that look (oh Lord! if you
could only see it as I have!) there's an ocean deep of sad disgust,
contempt, and sorrow. . . . The ideal was besmeared with mud, but as it is
no golden idol on feet of clay it stands to this day immovable . . . and
what the profane see is only their own mud thrown with their own hands, and
which has created a veil, an impassable barrier between them and the ideal .
. . without touching the latter. . . . 

Have a large Society, the more the better; all that is chaff and husk is
bound to fall away in time; all that is grain will remain. But the seed is
in the bad and evil man as well as in the good ones,--only it is more
difficult to call into life and cause it to germinate. The good husbandman
does not stop to pick out the seeds from the handful. He gives them all
their chance, and even some of the half-rotten seeds come to life when
thrown into good soil. Be that soil. . . . 

Look at me--the universal Theosophical manure--the rope for whose hanging
and lashing is made out of the flax I have sown, and each strand it is
twisted of represents a 'mistake' (so-called) of mine. Hence, if you fail
only nine times out of ten in your selections you are successful one time
out of ten--and that's more than many other Theosophists can say. . . .
Those few true souls will be the nucleus for future success, and their
children will. . . . Let us sow good--and if evil crops up, it will be blown
away by the wind like all other things in this life--in its time." 

"I am the Mother and the Creator of the Society; it has my magnetic fluid,
and the child has inherited all of its parent's physical, psychical, and
spiritual attributes--faults and virtues if any. Therefore I alone and to a
degree . . . can serve as a lightning conductor of Karma for it. I was asked
whether I was willing, when on the point of dying--and I said Yes--for it
was the only means to save it. Therefore I consented to live--which in my
case means to suffer physically during twelve hours of the day--mentally
twelve hours of night, when I get rid of the physical shell. . . . 

It is true about the Kali Yuga. Once that I have offered myself as the goat
of atonement, the Kali Yuga (4) recognizes its own--whereas any other would
shrink from such a thing--as I am doomed and overburdened in this life worse
than a poor weak donkey full of sores made to drag up hill a cart load of
heavy rocks. You are the first one to whom I tell it, because you force me
into the confession. . . .You have a wide and noble prospect before you if
you do not lose patience. . . . Try to hear the small voice within." 

"Yes, there are 'two persons' in me. But what of that? So there are two in
you; only mine is conscious and responsible--and yours is not. So you are
happier than I am. I know you sympathise with me, and you do so because you
feel that I have always stood up for you, and will do so to the bitter or
the happy end--as the case may be." 

"He may be moved to doubt--and that is the beginning of wisdom." 

"Well, sir, and my only friend, the crisis is nearing. I am ending my Secret
Doctrine, and you are going to replace me, or take my place in America. I
know you will have success if you do not lose heart; but do, do remain true
to the Masters and Their Theosophy and the names. . . . May They help you
and allow us to send you our best blessings. . . ." 

"There are traitors, conscious and unconscious. There is falsity and there
is injudiciousness. . . . Pray do not imagine that because I hold my tongue
as bound by my oath and duty I do not know who is who. . . . I must say
nothing, however much I may be disgusted. But as the ranks thin around us,
and one after the other our best intellectual forces depart, to turn into
bitter enemies, I say--Blessed are the pure-hearted who have only
intuition--for intuition is better than intellect." 

"The duty,--let alone happiness--of every Theosophist--and especially
Esotericist--is certainly to help others to carry their burden; but no
Theosophist or other has the right to sacrifice himself unless he knows for
a certainty that by so doing he helps some one and does not sacrifice
himself in vain for the empty glory of the abstract virtue. . . . Psychic
and vital energy are limited in every man. It is like a capital. If you have
a dollar a day and spend two, at the end of the month you will have a
deficit of $30." 

"One refuses to pledge himself not to listen without protest to any evil
thing said of a brother--as though Buddha our divine Lord-- or Jesus--or any
great initiate has ever condemned any one on hearsay. Ah, poor, poor, blind
man, not to know the difference between condemning in words--which is
uncharitable--and withdrawing in silent pity from the culprit and thus
punishing him, but still giving him a chance to repent of his ways. 

No man will ever speak ill of his brother without cause and proof of the
iniquity of that brother, and he will abstain from all backbiting,
slandering, and gossip. No man should ever say behind a Brother's back what
he would not say openly to his face. Insinuations against one's neighbor are
often productive of more evil consequences than gross slander. Every
Theosophist has to fight and battle against evil,--but he must have the
courage of his words and actions, and what he does must be done openly and
honestly before all." 

"Every pledge or promise unless built upon four pillars--absolute sincerity,
unflinching determination, unselfishness of purpose, and moral power, which
makes the fourth support and equipoises the three other pillars--is an
insecure building. The pledges of those who are sure of the strength of the
fourth alone are recorded." 

"Are you children, that you want marvels? Have you so little faith as to
need constant stimulus, as a dying fire needs fuel! . . . Would you let the
nucleus of a splendid Society die under your hands like a sick man under the
hands of a quack? . . . 

You should never forget what a solemn thing it is for us to exert our powers
and raise the dread sentinels that lie at the threshold. They cannot hurt
us, but they can avenge themselves by precipitating themselves upon the
unprotected neophyte. 

You are all like so many children playing with fire because it is pretty,
when you ought to be men studying philosophy for its own sake." 

"If among you there was one who embodied in himself the idea depicted, it
would be my duty to relinquish the teacher's chair to him. For it would be
the extreme of audacity in me to claim the possession of so many virtues.
That the MASTERS do in proportion to their respective temperaments and
stages of Bodhisatvic development possess such Paramitas, constitutes their
right to our reverence as our Teachers. It should be the aim of each and all
of us to strive with all the intensity of our natures to follow and imitate
Them. . . . 

Try to realize that progress is made step by step, and each step gained by
heroic effort. Withdrawal means despair or timidity. . . . Conquered
passions, like slain tigers, can no longer turn and rend you. Be hopeful
then, not despairing. With each morning's awakening try to live through the
day in harmony with the HIGHER SELF. 

'Try' is the battle-cry taught by the teacher to each pupil. Naught else is
expected of you. One who does his best does all that can be asked. 

There is a moment when even a Buddha ceases to be a sinning mortal and takes
his first step toward Buddhahood. The sixteen Paramitas (virtues) are not
for priests and yogis alone, as said, but stand for models for us all to
strive after--and neither priest nor yogi, Chela nor Mahatma, ever attained
all at once. . . . 

The idea that sinners and not saints are expected to enter the Path is
emphatically stated in the Voice of the Silence." 

"I do not believe in the success of the . . . T.S. unless you assimilate
Master or myself; unless you work with me and THEM, hand in hand, heart. . .
. Yes; let him who offers himself to Masters as a chela, unreservedly, . . .
let him do what he can if he would ever see Them. . . . Then things were
done because I alone was responsible for the issues. I alone had to bear
Karma in case of failure and no reward in case of success. . . . I saw the
T.S. would be smashed or that I had to offer myself as the Scapegoat for
atonement. It is the latter I did. 

The T.S. lives,--I am killed. Killed in my honor, fame, name, in everything
H.P.B. held near and dear, for this body is MINE and I feel acutely through
it. . . . I may err in my powers as H.P.B. I have not worked and toiled for
forty years, playing parts, risking my future reward, and taking karma upon
this unfortunate appearance to serve Them without being permitted to have
some voice in the matter. H.P.B. is not infallible. H.P.B. is an old,
rotten, sick, worn-out body, but it is the best I can have in this cycle. 

Hence follow the path I show, the Masters that are behind--and do not follow
me or my PATH. When I am dead and gone in this body, then will you know the
whole truth. Then will you know that I have never, never, been false to any
one, nor have I deceived anyone, but had many a time to allow them to
deceive themselves, for I had no right to interfere with their Karma. . . .
Oh ye foolish blind moles, all of you; who is able to offer himself in
sacrifice as I did!" 

Jasper Niemand,
PATH, June, July, August, 1892 


1 Dated December 1, 1888. Subsequent events proved the prediction true. 
 
2 Her correspondent had quoted the Simla letter of "K.H." in The Occult
World. 
 
3 Referring to the dilemma of an F.T.S. soldier in the army, presented to
her.
 
4 Kali Yuga--the Dark Age, the present cycle. 
 
---------------------------------------

Best wishes, 

Dallas

==================


-----Original Message-----
From: Cass 
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 
To: 
Subject: Re: Alice Bailey & the Adyar Society 


Dear Perry

Why don't you post it to all the TS's around the world, including Adyar?
Cass

==================

Perry wrote:


Hello All,

Thanks Jerry for taking the time to do this post it was very 
interesting . 
.

It seems that these historical issues need to really discussed openly 
in the Society.

I believe that open historical dialogue is important as it can start 
to clear away a lot of the underlying grievances and issues in the 
society by simply bringing them to light.

If the society does not want to be partisan to any particular ism it 
seems to me open discussion of some of this historical material needs 
to be discussed in lodges and branches and through published articles 
allowing for different perspectives and points of view.

CUT