Re: Theos-World Pedro on his "Difficulty" about use of concepts "Atma" and "S...
Nov 25, 2004 07:50 PM
by samblo
Daniel,
Thanks for the extracts, I have run into interesting information about the
Jonangpa School which you show an extract from David Reigle. The paper on
this website asserts that the Jonangpa School never really become "extinct" but
that to the contrary continued to exist and today in our time has 5000 Monks
and 40 Monasteries. Even more interesting is a recounting of the history of the
suppression of the Jonangpa and others by the Gelugpa School that details the
Political struggle involving outside "powers" of concern to the Gelugpa. This
is a most interesting insight from the viewpoint of "operative Karma" in
action. As an apparent result of the Gelugpa suppression in that time that was
dedicated to the deflecting of Foreign influence by the ruling power of China,
later in our time the Chinese, who back then were a "protector" of the Jonangpa
and several other Schools centuries later invade and ravage Tibet which in our
time was fully in the control of the Gelugpa resulting in the Tibetan Diaspora
to the outside world. I have never read this context before recently and
found it stimulating. With this new knowledge of the continued existence of the
Jonangpa School we might now perhaps be justified in expecting to see some
actual translations of their Texts from the "horses mouth."
Jonang Order
http://people.freenet.de/gruschke.andreas/Jonang_paper_E.htm
Also, another nuance I recently have read is that of a unique School in Tibet
Called the "Rimed Movement, 1813-1899" this School revived Dolpopa's Teaching
and was not affiliated with any of the Classical Tibetan Orders or Schools
and was composed of individual Teachers who though independent were also
respected by the Classical Orders of Tibet. This context made me think about the
Mahatma's and how they were said to have a unique reception and respect by the
prevailing Tibetan Orders yet were "independent" of them in various ways.
There were three primary Founders of this movement:
1. Lodro Thaye (blo gros mtha' yas) 1813-1899
2. Jamyang Khyentse Wangpo (jam dbyangs mkyhen brtse'i dbang po) 1820-1892
3. Chogyur Dechen Lingpa (mchog 'gyur bde chen gling pa) 1829-1870
They would have been contempory with Madam Blavatsky (1 & 2 especially).
Are there any references to them or the rimed Movement any where in the
Theosophical Archives?
A current Rimed Teacher:
namgyalgar-Chogyal Namkhai Norbu
http://www.dzogchen.org.au/rinpoche.html
Another thing is the usage of the terms "Father-Mother" which is seen in the
Dzyan stanza's "Father-Mother spin a web,"
two of the three Primary Tantra's are specifically and respectfully referred
to as Father and Mother.
From:http://www.berzinarchives.com/dzogchen/major_facets_dzogchen.html
"Within this scheme of anuttarayoga tantra:
father tantra emphasizes illusory body practice,
mother tantra emphasizes clear light practice,"
I hope Reigle is reading these posts, maybe he can give us his perspective,
as well as others on the Forum.
John
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application