Theos-Talk Archives (November 2004 Message tt00305)

Regina St Clare wrote:

<<My mystical moments" are VERY VISUAL, 
and being interested in film and how 
those "realities" can be portrayed, as 
they are so well in What Dreams May 
Come, I think we are closer to having 
access to the inner workings of how we 
create, via thought forms, whatever we 
want to make of IT, meaning the JUICE 
that we draw from to manifest anything.
A logical, visual display, can make it 
easier to understand so much.
Just as a picture is worth a 1000 words, 
a symbol is worth a 1000 metaphors.
It is that language thing again... 
realizing that we each have a personal 
vocabulary/experience for the same 
concepts... thus limited consensual 
language. >>

Okay, but apparently there's a 
"mystical" in the sense of that which 
cannot be described any which way and 
can only be experienced, re samadhi, eg.

<<Leon's work contributes a focus for 
understanidng.>>

Yes, I tend to agree, and I'm guessing 
that that "understanding" has taken a 
few turns along the way over the years, 
per whatever interpretive tendencies 
there might be out there.

<<Let us agree to agree that we need to 
have common language, so we can get 
beyond argueing whose way of seeing is 
better, (OK better for you) but we are 
challenged with we-ness, the "us", the 
radical Oneness, if you will.>>

OK. Haven't we all been working towards 
something like that, in some sense, all 
along ... Seems like a challenge that's 
been going on for a few million years, 
but, anyway, why stop now, eh ... 
Whatever. I think I prefer whatever 
might lead to some sort of transcending 
of karma/maya. In the meanwhile ... 
^:-/ ... Not that scratching my head has 
helped much, but ...

<Seeking to understand is where I think 
this chat is taking us...?
Maybe.
Regina>>

Maybe ...

Speculatively,
Mauri