Re: Theos-World re Leonardo's "Synthesis of Science, Religion and Phi losophy"
Nov 23, 2004 08:20 AM
by Regina St Clare
Mauri,Leon and All,
My mystical moments" are VERY VISUAL, and being interested in film and how those "realities" can be portrayed, as they are so well in What Dreams May Come, I think we are closer to having access to the inner workings of how we create, via thought forms, whatever we want to make of IT, meaning the JUICE that we draw from to manifest anything.
A logical, visual display, can make it easier to understand so much.
Just as a picture is worth a 1000 words, a symbol is worth a 1000 metaphors.
It is that language thing again...realizing that we each have a personal vocabulary/experience for the same concepts... thus limited consensual language.
Leon's work contributes a focus for understanidng.
Let us agree to agree that we need to have common language, so we can get beyond argueing whose way of seeing is better, (OK better for you) but we are challenged with we-ness, the "us", the radical Oneness, if you will.
Seeking to understand is where I think this chat is taking us...?
-- Mauri <mhart@i...> wrote:
Leonardo wrote, in part: <<That
synthesis is what the Secret Doctrine is
all about... Since the "science" spoken
of, in its "synthesis of science,
religion and philosophy," is a merger of
metaphysical science with physical
science -- which, incidentally, since
Einstein made that merger a living
reality (and the new M-theory takes it
even deeper by unifying his mutually
incompatible relativity and quantum
theories) -- the old "mystical" (even up
to AAB who was stuck in it) aspects of
theosophy no longer exist. Vide, Leon
Maurer's ABC theory -- that pulls all
those scientific theories together and
links them to what was the "ancient
metaphysical mysteries" -- which have
now been turned into a simple and
scientific philosophy (that can be
intuitively "visualized," if not
explained in words) >>
"Intuitively 'visualized'" might be one
thing, in whatever context, but I was
referring to "mystical" in terms of
"that which can only be experienced but
cannot be described." To my way of
speculating, "intuitive visualization"
doesn't sound like the same thing, in
terms of how those words might be
generally interpreted, as "direct
mystical/occult/esoteric. In terms of
modeling (if Theosophy is seen as a form
of modeling of r/Reality/t/Truth) such
"intuitive visualization" might be
"understandable," in whatever
sense/context, but I've been under the
impression that before one can have
certain "direct experiences," one would
have to somehow transcend all forms of
modeling. Of course if one thinks that
one's modeling is good for that kind of
transcending (and that might be why some
of us might have an interest in the
likes of Theosophy and ABC's ...) ...
what can I say ... Still, at the end of
the day ... ^:-/ ...
<<He's doing well... Speculating on the
pure scientific aspects of theosophy...
But sometimes leaves the religious,
yogic, or mystical occult stuff for me
to rave about. :-) >>
Oh, okay ... ^:-/ ...
Yahoo! Groups Links
Juno Platinum $9.95. Juno SpeedBand $14.95.
Sign up for Juno Today at http://www.juno.com!
Look for special offers at Best Buy stores.
[Back to Top]
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application