theos-talk.com

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Theos-World To Pedro & Anand: Serious Questions with Profound Implications

Sep 04, 2004 07:57 AM
by krishtar


Katinka and all
Hi
Perhaps God may takes several names due to different levels of conscience.
Inner self?
God?
We must have a deep relationship with God in the way we conceive It.
Some go to a calmful place in order to talk to Him, Some just sit and meditate.
Some go to a church.
Some go into an esotheric section of a certain brotherhood.
If we take several works about related subjects in the field of esothericism weŽll always face different interpretations from the authors, principally due to their level con enlightenment.
So IMo we must take their best and form, shape our own concepts.

K
----- Original Message ----- 
From: adelasie 
To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Saturday, September 04, 2004 11:31 AM
Subject: Re: Theos-World To Pedro & Anand: Serious Questions with Profound Implications


Dear Katinka,

Yes indeed. There is only one Truth. All little truths come from that 
one Truth. All manifestation comes from one source. It is all a 
matter of one's point of view. How can any of us decide what another 
person needs to believe is true in order to serve as karma demands? 
If we look at the full moon from earth, we will describe it as a 
bright globe. If we look at it from outer space, we may describe it 
as a dark disk. Is one more "right" than another? Theosophy teaches 
us to make our own certain inalienable principles, laws of nature, 
and to measure what we encounter against them. But we have to do the 
work. 

Best wishes,
Adelasie

On 4 Sep 2004 at 6:32, Katinka Hesselink wrote:

> HI Adelasie,
> 
> Are you saying that if Leadbeater says devachan is the opposite of
> what Blavatsky says it is - that both could be right? Or that if
> Bailey says to pray to a God and Blavatsky says that no God, except
> the higher self ought to be prayed to - that both could be right? In
> short: if there are clear contradictions, how can it be dependent on
> the observer?
> 
> Katinka




   
Yahoo! Groups Links



   



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application