Theos-Talk Archives (August 2004 Message tt00680)

Hallo Dallas and all,

My views are:

One thing is aim - another is what do the Seeker after wisdom and compassion
actually spiritually learn something from.

If one learns something from being, what roughly could be called a nun or a
monk
and only fuck with ones partner of the opposite gender 2-3 times in a
lifetime to get a few children,
the question is - whether that covers the thumb of rule for EVERY
theosophist?
And is THIS the code of conduct, which the theosophical teaching seek to
promote? Is it Dallas?
I will flatly reject any positive answer to that question.

Love is IMPORTANT even if a post-theosophical-nun or post-theosophical-monk
won't understand it.
Sex is never or at least very seldom only a selfish activity - you aught to
know about that Dallas - since you are not what can be called a young man
anymore.

So why this question of yours ?


from
M. Sufilight with peace and love...



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "W.Dallas TenBroeck" <dalval14@earthlink.net>
To: "AA-BNStudy" <study@blavatsky.net>
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004 2:27 PM
Subject: RE: Theos-World Working with controversy


> Aug 20 2044
>
> Dear Norton:
>
> It is not the superficial attitudes of people that are alone to be
> considered.
>
> The Moral implications of the sex act are that two parents offer
themselves
> to make a safe and secure place for an incoming, a returning Monad -- a
> returning Ego.
>
> If that is not considered then the act is performed for selfish enjoyment
> alone.
>
> Is that its aim?
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Dallas
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Morten N. Olesen [mailto:global-theosophy@adslhome.dk]
> Sent: Sunday, August 29, 2004 5:58 AM
> To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: Theos-World Working with controversy
>
> Hallo Dallas and all,
>
> My views are:
>
> Thanks for mailing this - extremely long - article...
> Although I think a more theosophical approach would have been to have
> chopped it up in 3-4 parts,
> so to be in accordance with the altruistic theosophical view - and shown
> compassion to those having a slow modem.
>
> In the article Blavatsky wrote:
> "It is only by the close brotherly union of men's inner SELVES, of
> soul-solidarity, of the growth and development of that feeling which makes
> one suffer when one thinks of the suffering of others, that the reign of
> Justice and equality for all can ever be inaugurated. This is the first of
> the three fundamental objects for which the Theosophical Society was
> established, and called the "Universal Brotherhood of Man," without
> distinction of race, colour or creed."
>
> Comments:
> Now this leads me to suggest, that if one have as ones objective to create
> growth of this "feeling"
> which Blavatsky talks about, - then a sexual relationship could be
important
> in developing it.
> And relationships in general among various people aught to be of a kind,
> which implies, that
> one meets with those people who are capeable of giving the most fruit in
> nurturing this "feeling"
> either to one self or to others. Living in a cave seems not to be the
right
> solution.
>
>
>
> from
> M. Sufilight with peace and love...
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "W.Dallas TenBroeck" <dalval14@earthlink.net>
> To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Sunday, August 29, 2004 12:33 PM
> Subject: RE: Theos-World Working with controversy
>
>
> Aug 29 2004
>
> Dear Perry
>
> Have a look at this idea and association, ORGANIZATION as an ideal for the
> THEOSOPHICAL SOCIETY :
>
> It is "back to Blavatsky" that is needed.
>
> HPB had it down clearly
>
> ---------------------------------
> THE THEOSOPHICAL SOCIETY: ITS MISSION AND ITS FUTURE
>
> Article by H. P. Blavatsky
>
> [AS EXPLAINED BY M. EMILE BURNOUF, THE FRENCH ORIENTALIST]
>
> By H. P. BLAVATSKY
>
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________
> _________
> [cut short by M. Sufilight]
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>