Theos-Talk Archives (August 2004 Message tt00675)

Aug 20 2044

Dear Norton:

It is not the superficial attitudes of people that are alone to be
considered.

The Moral implications of the sex act are that two parents offer themselves
to make a safe and secure place for an incoming, a returning Monad -- a
returning Ego.

If that is not considered then the act is performed for selfish enjoyment
alone.

Is that its aim?

Best wishes,

Dallas
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Morten N. Olesen [mailto:global-theosophy@adslhome.dk] 
Sent: Sunday, August 29, 2004 5:58 AM
To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: Theos-World Working with controversy

Hallo Dallas and all,

My views are:

Thanks for mailing this - extremely long - article...
Although I think a more theosophical approach would have been to have
chopped it up in 3-4 parts,
so to be in accordance with the altruistic theosophical view - and shown
compassion to those having a slow modem.

In the article Blavatsky wrote:
"It is only by the close brotherly union of men's inner SELVES, of
soul-solidarity, of the growth and development of that feeling which makes
one suffer when one thinks of the suffering of others, that the reign of
Justice and equality for all can ever be inaugurated. This is the first of
the three fundamental objects for which the Theosophical Society was
established, and called the "Universal Brotherhood of Man," without
distinction of race, colour or creed."

Comments:
Now this leads me to suggest, that if one have as ones objective to create
growth of this "feeling"
which Blavatsky talks about, - then a sexual relationship could be important
in developing it.
And relationships in general among various people aught to be of a kind,
which implies, that
one meets with those people who are capeable of giving the most fruit in
nurturing this "feeling"
either to one self or to others. Living in a cave seems not to be the right
solution.



from
M. Sufilight with peace and love...


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "W.Dallas TenBroeck" <dalval14@earthlink.net>
To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 29, 2004 12:33 PM
Subject: RE: Theos-World Working with controversy


Aug 29 2004

Dear Perry

Have a look at this idea and association, ORGANIZATION as an ideal for the
THEOSOPHICAL SOCIETY :

It is "back to Blavatsky" that is needed.

HPB had it down clearly

---------------------------------
THE THEOSOPHICAL SOCIETY: ITS MISSION AND ITS FUTURE

Article by H. P. Blavatsky

[AS EXPLAINED BY M. EMILE BURNOUF, THE FRENCH ORIENTALIST]

By H. P. BLAVATSKY


____________________________________________________________________________
_________
[cut short by M. Sufilight]



 
Yahoo! Groups Links