Theos-Talk Archives (August 2004 Message tt00659)

Aug 29 2004

RE: BBC: Lost city 'could rewrite history

Seems very interesting.

Add to data?

Others ?

Dallas

=============================
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Normandebrus
Sent: Sunday, August 29, 2004 6:50 AM
To: 
Subject: BBC: Lost city 'could rewrite history'

"The whole model of the origins of civilisation will have to be remade from 
scratch..."

Lost city 'could rewrite history'

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/1768109.stm

Saturday, 19 January, 2002, 06:33 GMT 

The city is believed to predate the Harappan civilisation

By BBC News Online's Tom Housden 
The remains of what has been described as a huge lost city may force 
historians and archaeologists to radically reconsider their view of ancient
human 
history. 
Marine scientists say archaeological remains discovered 36 metres (120 feet)

underwater in the Gulf of Cambay off the western coast of India could be
over 
9,000 years old. 
The vast city - which is five miles long and two miles wide - is believed to

predate the oldest known remains in the subcontinent by more than 5,000
years. 
The site was discovered by chance last year by oceanographers from India's 
National Institute of Ocean Technology conducting a survey of pollution. 
Using sidescan sonar - which sends a beam of sound waves down to the bottom 
of the ocean they identified huge geometrical structures at a depth of
120ft. 
Debris recovered from the site - including construction material, pottery, 
sections of walls, beads, sculpture and human bones and teeth has been
carbon 
dated and found to be nearly 9,500 years old. 
Lost civilisation 
The city is believed to be even older than the ancient Harappan
civilisation, 
which dates back around 4,000 years. 
Marine archaeologists have used a technique known as sub-bottom profiling to

show that the buildings remains stand on enormous foundations. 
Author and film-maker Graham Hancock - who has written extensively on the 
uncovering of ancient civilisations - told BBC News Online that the evidence
was 
compelling: 
"The [oceanographers] found that they were dealing with two large blocks of 
apparently man made structures. 
"Cities on this scale are not known in the archaeological record until 
roughly 4,500 years ago when the first big cities begin to appear in
Mesopotamia. 
"Nothing else on the scale of the underwater cities of Cambay is known. The 
first cities of the historical period are as far away from these cities as
we 
are today from the pyramids of Egypt," he said. 
Chronological problem 
This, Mr Hancock told BBC News Online, could have massive repercussions for 
our view of the ancient world. 
"There's a huge chronological problem in this discovery. It means that the 
whole model of the origins of civilisation with which archaeologists have
been 
working will have to be remade from scratch," he said. 
However, archaeologist Justin Morris from the British Museum said more work 
would need to be undertaken before the site could be categorically said to 
belong to a 9,000 year old civilisation. 
"Culturally speaking, in that part of the world there were no civilisations 
prior to about 2,500 BC. What's happening before then mainly consisted of 
small, village settlements," he told BBC News Online. 
Dr Morris added that artefacts from the site would need to be very carefully

analysed, and pointed out that the C14 carbon dating process is not without 
its error margins. 
It is believed that the area was submerged as ice caps melted at the end of 
the last ice age 9-10,000 years ago 
Although the first signs of a significant find came eight months ago, 
exploring the area has been extremely difficult because the remains lie in
highly 
treacherous waters, with strong currents and rip tides. 
The Indian Minister for Human Resources and ocean development said a group 
had been formed to oversee further studies in the area. 
"We have to find out what happened then ... where and how this civilisation 
vanished," he said. 
~
Of interest:

Is the Hopi Deity Kokopelli an Ancient Hindu God?

http://www.viewzone.com/kokopeli.html
Native-Americans With Ancestors From India?
http://www.hvk.org/articles/0304/123.html
*