theos-talk.com

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

re John's "convergence"

Jul 16, 2004 08:08 PM
by Mauri



John wrote: <<I have come to the opinion that the classically understood void, emptiness, Maya are regulated and monitored by the limitation that was inherent anciently when the doctrine was originated due to the absence of any means to scientifically monitor, view, or telemetrize such idea's as which Science is now becoming more able to do. It might also be that the doctrine of dependent origination so classic in multiple teachings could also come to indicate "Interdependent Origination" which is what Gariaev's Research tends to show, viz that there is a continuos unbroken sutra of manifestation, communication, and organization from Consciousness to the Non-local, non-temporal void (Quantum Matrix) into the most subtle energies and thence throughout the ascending hierarchy of organized matter that constitutes our human vehicle. That this is in effect a de facto Maya due to our organs of perception limitation which does not see the rest of the iceberg, and is not aware perceptually of the overall fineness of the entire stream of the standing wave organization that constitutes the Quantum Reality. Buddhism maintains that there is no "abiding" self moment to moment, I see a strong relation when reading Gariaev's papers and the papers of Robert Neil Boyd and others. It was for this reason I earlier posted about a "convergence" of science, religion, and philosophy.>>

John, I haven't read your "convergence" post (I couldn't find it), but I'm wondering if you might mean "convergence" in terms of a "bridge from exoteric to esoteric/occult/experiential," in some sense, or if you might be referring to a "convergence" from some more established exoteric interpretation toward another, more comprehensive exoteric (orthodox, literal ... ?) interpretation of the kind that might be generally seen to be not particularly involved with experiential aspects the Esoteric Tradition and Pathworking. Not that some exoteric versions/interpretations might not be helpful in some sense no matter how literal/orthodox they might seem from some other perspective.

Speculatively,
Mauri





[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application