Theos-Talk Archives (May 2004 Message tt00119)

Steve
Just for complement, their terminology and their points of view on the structure of the Man differ a lot from Theosophy, I am an inactive member and was willing to come back but I took the monographs , review some of Žem and I am insecure if it is possible to conciliate both wolds, Theosophy and Rosicrucianism of AMORC.
What is your view?

Krishtar

----- Original Message ----- 
From: stevestubbs 
To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 10:44 AM
Subject: Re: Theos-World Digest Number 1458


--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, colleen wall <niceisis@y...> wrote:
> I would like to find out what you have to say of the AMORC and RC 
theories I really enjoy what I have learned from all of you such 
detail much knowledge here I am on the path and every turn I learn 
more I want to thank you for your wisdom 

Their exercises do work, although you have to work with some of them 
persistently to get results. I saw some really amazing things when I 
was a member. It is desirable to join one of their lodges and visit 
consistently since you will see and learn interesting things from 
their members. Their entire correspondence course takes about 17 
years to complete, although I think you get through the meat of it 
when you complete the 12th degree.

One thing that should be said is that they are into specifically 
psychic development. They admit their methods do not lead to 
enlightenment for most people. If that is your goal you might want 
to explore something like Zen.




   
Yahoo! Groups Links



   



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]