Re: T.S. and the "Masters" these days
Apr 01, 2004 04:46 PM
by stevestubbs
--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "kpauljohnson" <kpauljohnson@y...>
wrote:
> My faulty memory may not be much help here, but if I recall
> correctly Gregory Tillett asked Radha this question outright and
she
> answered in the negative. Even if my memory is correct on this,
I'm
> not sure that the same answer would be given within the sanctum
> sanctorum of the ES. Similarly, I think I recall Grace Knoche
> saying no to this question in print, but this public reply might
not
> be taken as final by her most ardent admirers.
I doubt this is true anymore, but years ago when the Rosicrucians
were run by Ralph M. Lewis, and especially before that when it was
run by his father H. Spencer Lewis, the claim was made that the
leaders were in contact with the Masters and that advanced students
could in some cases be taken under their tutelage as well. In fact,
being accepted as a chela was the end result aimed at by their course
of instruction. Membership did not guarantee chelaship, but a few
advanced members did claim to have been initiated. These claims were
ridiculed by Manly P. Hall, but I think without sufficient
justification.
> Kinda like "salvation"
> with Christians, who have argued for centuries about who has it,
> with little serious examination of what it is exactly and what
> evidence they have for believing in it.
Excellent point. "Salvation" is a totally meaningless concept today,
but in sncient times it seems to have meant an ongoing connection
with the Higher Self. Readers of Plato (esp. THE SYMPOSIUM and THE
APOLOGY) will remember that Socrates was advised by an inner voice he
referred to as his daimonium (usually referred to as daemon.) In an
effort to discredit Socrates the word "dasemon" was redefined to
mean "evil spirit" and the original meaning of "salvation" fell
away, It is notable that the "daemon" of Socrates is what was
referred to in the OT as a "familiar spirit", the possession of which
ws punishable by death under Mosaic law. Being cut off from
communication with the Higher Self was therefore thought to be an
excellent thing by the most ancient of Jews, although one could
wonder whether they were against mystical experience or charlatanry.
According to the views of later mystics, some of the crimes they
committed, such as pillaging Egypt and destroying the Canaanites,
would have caused them to have the spiritual isolation they so much
desired. Yet Elijah, with his "still small voice" seems to have
broken with that tradition.
Anyway, that should answer all the questions implied in your
statement.
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application