Re: T.S. and the "Masters" these days
Apr 01, 2004 10:05 AM
by kpauljohnson
--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "walkinsnotwelcome"
<zolarczakl@n...> wrote:
> There was an idea in M. Sufilight's last posting that I'm altering
> here. Is there any evidence that the leadership of the
Theosophical
> Society is in a working relationship with the original Brotherhood
of
> Adepts? Do they even claim to be ? And does it matter? If I knew
I'd
> just tell you, instead of using this irritating questioning mode,
> which isn't intended to be rhetorical. Though I do think it
matters.
Hi,
My faulty memory may not be much help here, but if I recall
correctly Gregory Tillett asked Radha this question outright and she
answered in the negative. Even if my memory is correct on this, I'm
not sure that the same answer would be given within the sanctum
sanctorum of the ES. Similarly, I think I recall Grace Knoche
saying no to this question in print, but this public reply might not
be taken as final by her most ardent admirers.
That answers your second question. As to #1-- what would constitute
evidence? And #3-- "matters" is not an objective judgment; things
don't "matter" in a vacuum but *to* someone or some group of
people. Who is or isn't in communication with the Brotherhood
matters immensely to many Theosophists and has the source of endless
debate for more than a century. By contrast, more basic questions
about said Brotherhood (e.g. does it exist and what is it exactly)
hardly receive any consideration and remain in the realm of
unquestioned (unquestionable) assumptions. Kinda like "salvation"
with Christians, who have argued for centuries about who has it,
with little serious examination of what it is exactly and what
evidence they have for believing in it.
Paul
PS-- Greg posts here from time to time and might comment if asked.
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application