Re: freedom of thought
Mar 26, 2004 12:23 PM
by John Plummer
--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, Bart Lidofsky <bartl@s...> wrote:
> walkinsnotwelcome wrote:
> > It wasn't disagreement with Steiner's religious beliefs that he
had a
> > problem with, it was membership in the Krishnamurti-as-Maitreya
> > organization, the Order of the Star in the East I believe it was
> > called.
>
> Which meant that he kept people out because they had
religious beliefs
> that differed from his own.
>
> Bart
Bart is quite correct. I have a lot of admiration for some things
that Steiner did (Waldorf education, Biodynamic agriculture) and have
learned much from him and some of his disciples (Owen Barfield, Chris
Bamford, etc). But he definitely was intolerant over a number of
issues, esp Krishnamurti, around the split with the TS. Just read
any of Rudi's lectures from the second half of 1912, as things were
coming to a head. Not pretty.
Many things caused the split -- Steiner's ego as a spiritual teacher
and clairvoyant with a growing group of followers; his view of
Christianity vis-a-vis other world religions; etc -- Krishnamurti was
just a point of focus for all this. (And I don't mean to imply that
those on the TS side -- Mrs Besant and CWL -- were innocent saints.
Tempers flared on all sides, which did not help matters.)
Just like all of us, these folks had both great strengths and
significant personal failings. I think we have to learn from their
good work, while not avoiding an honest, but compassionate, awareness
of the less edifying parts of the story.
John
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application