Re: Mary Magdalene
Mar 20, 2004 05:46 AM
by stevestubbs
--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, samblo@c... wrote:
> Ephraem makes a great to-do about the mystery of their conception,
which he
> says he is ashamed to relate. It appears, however, to have been
nothing more
> than the conception of the Mother first without her Syzygy or
Divine Consort,
> and subsequently with Him;
Mead has some valuable stuff but little insight. You have to
therefore use him for the materials he quotes and then go beyond him.
Sophia literally means "Wisdom" and id I rememner orrectly the Greek
name of her metaphorical consort (the other person in hersyzygy)
means "Virtue". So when Sophia brought forth Achamoth immaculately,
she produced as Wisdom without Virtue. You can see how all this is
metaphorical and has several layers of meaning. The story of the
woman with an issue of blood who was healed by touching the garment
of Christ is a reference to this idea. She was healed according to
the story by receiving "vrtue" from J. There is also an allusion to
the idea of Achamoth as an abortion in the peculiar statement of Paul
that he was "born out of due time." So all of these statements
contain hidden meanings. Incidentally, this is what Origen,
Irenaeus, et al say and not any discovery of my own.
I am not suggesting that anyone believe this as literally true, but
on one level it is true inasmuch as it shows how far off the literal
interpretation is. So much for fundamentalists reading bad
translations and pouding their bibles. So mich for sidewalk
preachers and their self assurance. The very book they bang does not
say what they think it says.
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application