theos-talk.com

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Theos-World Who dictated Alice Bailey's books?

Mar 20, 2004 02:56 AM
by Morten Nymann Olesen


Hallo all of you,

My views are:

To "drop" an aspirant - to me simply meant to ship the aspirant to another
group or let the aspirant go the path alone - for a while.
I think it was there we misunderstood each other.

Some aspirants cannot just be taken inside.
They would simply be a problem to the spiritual and perhaps social relations
among people.

The previous example one more time:
A sick horse would be taken care of at its own place and not at the race
track where the other horses come thundering by with the judge in his tower.
Do you not agree ?

Sometimes the sick horses are being taken care of in groups. At other times
the horse is alone.
Sometimes Circumstances or spiritual insight creates these situations and
not always the good intentions on a somewhat lower level.




from
M. Sufilight with peace and love...

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Pedro Oliveira" <prmoliveira@yahoo.com>
To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2004 2:34 AM
Subject: Re: Theos-World Who dictated Alice Bailey's books?


>
> > I think you've got your terms mixed up, besides
> > splitting hairs over who
> > meant what. Firstly, Karma is not Compassion, nor
> > compassionate- far from
> > it. Perhaps you mean "Dharma", not "Karma"? Karma is
> > cold, unfeeling, the
> > Cosmic Law that Newton's laws of physics echoes.
> > Secondly, the 'dropping'
> > refers to an act by the School, not Karma- although
> > there may have been some
> > 'dropping' of key words.
>
> > regards-
> >
> > ALi
>
> I was replying to Morten's statement:
>
> "The Arcane School if it was (and is) a real School of
> Wisdom will because of
> the laws of Karma have to
> drop certain (and not "all" - Bailey didn't say "all")
> emotional aspirants
> and other persons, who wouldn't or
> will not fit the pattern."
>
> I was referring to Karma, not Dharma. Even a cursory
> reading of the Mahatma Letters shows that their
> philosophy cannot be understood in terms of Newtonian
> physics. If the universal laws emanate from a Source
> described as Sat, Chit, Ananda, which can be roughly
> translated as Boundless Existence, Universal
> Intelligence and Absolute Bliss, there may be nothing
> "cold" about them. It is interesting that those who
> have become one with the Law are the most
> compassionate and the most wise among human beings.
>
> And is it not compassionate a Law that returns to you
> the quality of your very action, though and feeling,
> as well as motive, so that you can learn to look at
> yourself, heal your mind from the age-old disease of
> separateness and become another beneficent force in
> Nature?
>
> But, I may be wrong, although I have hardly any hair
> left to split.
>
> fraternal regards,
>
> Pedro
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>




[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application