Theos-Talk Archives (March 2004 Message tt00412)

> I think you've got your terms mixed up, besides
> splitting hairs over who 
> meant what. Firstly, Karma is not Compassion, nor
> compassionate- far from 
> it. Perhaps you mean "Dharma", not "Karma"? Karma is
> cold, unfeeling, the 
> Cosmic Law that Newton's laws of physics echoes.
> Secondly, the 'dropping' 
> refers to an act by the School, not Karma- although
> there may have been some 
> 'dropping' of key words.

> regards-
> 
> ALi

I was replying to Morten's statement:

"The Arcane School if it was (and is) a real School of
Wisdom will because of
the laws of Karma have to
drop certain (and not "all" - Bailey didn't say "all")
emotional aspirants
and other persons, who wouldn't or
will not fit the pattern."

I was referring to Karma, not Dharma. Even a cursory
reading of the Mahatma Letters shows that their
philosophy cannot be understood in terms of Newtonian
physics. If the universal laws emanate from a Source
described as Sat, Chit, Ananda, which can be roughly
translated as Boundless Existence, Universal
Intelligence and Absolute Bliss, there may be nothing
"cold" about them. It is interesting that those who
have become one with the Law are the most
compassionate and the most wise among human beings.

And is it not compassionate a Law that returns to you
the quality of your very action, though and feeling,
as well as motive, so that you can learn to look at
yourself, heal your mind from the age-old disease of
separateness and become another beneficent force in
Nature?

But, I may be wrong, although I have hardly any hair
left to split.

fraternal regards,

Pedro



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam
http://mail.yahoo.com