Theos-Talk Archives (March 2004 Message tt00208)

>In any case, UNIVERSAL BROTHERHOOD is prime object of THEOSOPHY. It is

Dallas, is it then logical to be concluded from your statement above that
from the theosophical point of view a race which claims to be superior over
other races PER SE is a wrong conviction? Does Theosopyh teach teach that
all races are equal? Or does Theosophy teach that one race after another has
its ups and downs and therefore suceed one another from time to time? And if
so, which time do we have now?
One theosophical school teaches that we are now in the fifth subrace, while
another theosophical teaches that we are not in the fifth subrace. The one
may be regarded as the lower vehicle and the other as the higher vehicle,
or: the struggle between esoteric and exoteric Theosophists.
It is a well known fact among historicans that Jewish groups proclaim since
twohundred or so years Universal Brotherhood.
Does this phrase has the same content as the theosophical phrase of
Universal Brotherhood?
And if so, why f.e. Gottfried de Purucker dropped this phrase in 1929 from
the first aim of his TS?
And if the Jewish and Aryan phrases of UB differ:
How can Theosophy help to distinct one from the other?
Frank