Theos-Talk Archives (January 2004 Message tt00378)

Morten wrote: <<Maybe that is why the 
Masters are so difficult to reach to 
some newcomers, who are "speculating" 
around non-dualism. (smile...)>>

Seems to me that non-Masters might 
generally tend to be kind of karmically 
influenced, limited in their thinking, 
speculating, theorizing, modeling, 
Theosophizing, etc. So what are the 
choices, in terms of p/Path making, that 
such non-Masters might have ... Seems to 
me that some of them might, among other 
things, decide to comparatively blindly 
adopt whatever belief system or model, 
or some of them might want to see if 
they can try to understand certain 
things in some way that might make some 
kind of sense to them 
more-individually/eclectically. 
Speculation, as I see it, seems to be 
synomynous with comparatively 
independent, eclectic thinking, and so 
seems to me, in a sense, a "good" thing, 
generally speaking, where p/Path making 
is concerned, where it fosters basics of 
honesty of approach, as compared to 
whatever approach that might be seen as 
less open to freedom of thought ---where 
the latter might be seen to foster 
comparatively blind constraints and 
illusions. Not that we don't all have 
our own karma to deal with, for better 
or worse, apparently.

Speculatively,
Mauri