Theos-Talk Archives (January 2004 Message tt00146)

Hallo Morton,

That is a nice supply to the meaning I drops in message nr 14402.

so you see this is the well known dialogue.Everyone give what he have 
and find something back to be more wise.
Thanks,

P.s. Here in Holland this evening round the clock of six Venus was 
lighting a wonderfull light from the south sky and makes it 
wonderfull blue, only to see for half an hour, after that the sky 
looked black.

Let us enjoy nature!!!
Best wishes Christina.


--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Morten Nymann Olesen" <global-
theosophy@a...> wrote:
> Hallo Bart and all of you,
> 
> My views are:
> 
> A short version. Compassion is an unselfish and spiritual feeling 
which comes forth from the non-physical heart center and grows up
> and through the head of the disciple who has pleged to do God's 
will. Spiritual thoughts comes from the heart of compassion. 
> On another level it is a similar spiritual feeling, but a feeling 
of oneness which acts
> or lives on - a so to speak - 'very beyond' level. 
> But also: What is truely compassionate is maybe what we would call 
silence.
> Compassion is silent and cannot easily be absorbed by the more 
ordinary senses.
> 
> 
> I suggest the following:
> Talk with sweet and soft voice also while emailing at a forum.
> Never fall so low as to 'scream' at another person while emailing 
at a forum.
> Never use tough words, which might lower the general atmosphere 
among the forums readers - that is if you email at a forum.
> At least seek to avoid doing so.
> Always seek to help, never hurt. If you can't help then at least 
avoid hurting. Or be silent.
> Misunderstandings can happen especially at a place like this where 
many people from various cultures and countries meet - and we all 
know that.
> Misunderstandings we can relate to and work with.
> 
> 
> The following might helpful to add.
> Blavatsky writes the following in the book called "The Key to 
Theosophy" chapter 12:
> "It is this very law of Karma which gives strength to all that I 
have said. The individual cannot separate himself from the race, nor 
the race from the individual. The law of Karma applies equally to 
all, although all are not equally developed. In helping on the 
development of others, the Theosophist believes that he is not only 
helping them to fulfil their Karma, but that he is also, in the 
strictest sense, fulfilling his own. It is the development of 
humanity, of which both he and they are integral parts, that he has 
always in view, and he knows that any failure on his part to respond 
to the highest within him retards not only himself but all, in their 
progressive march. By his actions, he can make it either more 
difficult or more easy for humanity to attain the next higher plane 
of being." (This is to those whom the Law of Karma as importance.)
> 
> To those whom the Law of Karma has no importance I suggest this:
> The individual cannot separate himself from the society, nor the 
society from the individual. The moral laws of this universe applies 
equally to all, although all are not equally developed. In helping on 
the development of others, the Theosophist believes that he is not 
only helping them to fulfil their spiritual development, but that he 
is also, in the strictest sense, fulfilling his own. It is the 
development of humanity, of which both he and they are integral 
parts, that he has always in view, and he knows that any failure on 
his part to respond to the highest within him retards not only 
himself but all, in their progressive march. By his actions, he can 
make it either more difficult or more easy for humanity to attain the 
next higher plane of being.
> 
> (To Bart: I just fail to see where your sentences with the 
word "Bullshit" on the top can make it all easier to the readers.)
> 
> But I also think never-the-less that the following deserves 
attention:
> A spiritual group - It will deal with everyone according to 
capacity and character,
> being neither benevolent nor the reverse: for kindness and cruelty,
> while effective and understood in ordinary relationships, operate as
> part of a conditioning system within a teaching or group situation.
> 
> --- To put it shortly. What was important was the following: 
Netemara said about Blavatsky's relation to Bailey could be the 
truth. But it could also be a lie. Can we ever really proove this at 
this forum ? But we could throw some views around so to get closer to 
reality. But maybe "Bullshit" is closer to reality to you ? - I just 
ask. ---
> 
> 
> These were just my views.
> Did this help ?
> Di this help the readers ?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> from
> M. Sufilight with peace and love...
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Bart Lidofsky" <bartl@s...>
> To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2004 5:28 PM
> Subject: Re: Theos-World Re: [bn-study] RE: good-bye to the BIG 
BANG theory
> 
> 
> > Morten Nymann Olesen wrote:
> > > That doesn't make your inkvisition like use of words 
compassionate, does it
> > > ?
> > 
> > What would be compassionate?
> > 
> > Bart
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > 
> > To visit your group on the web, go to:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/
> > 
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > theos-talk-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > 
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
> > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
> > 
> > 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]