Theos-Talk Archives (January 2004 Message tt00121)

Dear Leon,

Much thank for all your information, interesting website, and the links 
(the Electric Sun is a great article ... with the double layer). Thank 
you also for the long reactions on my previous posts. For your 
information: I am Dutch speaking so some sentences may look a little 
bite strange.

Leon, before going further in discussions about M-branes, etc. I want 
to share first some of my conceptual concerns on electricity.

Conceptual I always had a problem with 'fields'. What is a field?
Our quest goes for a unification concept. So we need to start at the 
top.

Unification or Unity means 'indestructibility' but also constant 
connectivity of all possible parts and forms of manifestation: 
interconnectivity. No breaking, no tearing. There is always Unity, but 
in our conscious and physic realities: restructured Unity.
The definition 'FIELD' doesn't give me that aspect of Unity, to me - 
personally - a field is a totality of separated events which influence 
each other.
Therefor I use the concept 'membrane', which is indestructible (almost 
infinite elastic) and dynamic. That's all. There is not else. You, 
Dallas, Alden, Daniel, Bart ... me ... we are LOCALLY restructured 
Unity.

As such the interconnectivity is of higher unification order than 
ElectroMagnetism, and (indestructible) interconnectivity can only be 
expressed by one effect: gravity.
So gravity is the prime source. Buddha spoke about: Stress. We can also 
speak about AIN.
All other forces are specific expression of gravity. Emanations of 
Interconnectivity.
How can gravity bring us electricity?
Conceptually Electricity is the result of an unbalance between two 
zones with different (vibrational) potency. That implies that there 
must be 'ISOLATION', that separates two such zones for a given time. 
When there is no isolation these zones will neutralize eachother. So we 
need to construct a locality that embeds duality but separated by an 
isolated boundary.
In gravitational perspective: the gravitational membrane that begets 
itself to become locally a double layered monad (still fully connected, 
better: still BEING part of the Unity). I call such monad a holon (but 
what's in a name?). These monads build up on the membrane in more 
complex monads. They are like elastic braced on the membrane since they 
are locally restructured membrane.

Since the total membrane system has continuos motion (kinetics) also 
the layers in all monads move. But since the layers of the monads are 
PRESSED together we get locally a new effect: Friction 
(ThermoDynamics). This local friction provokes new secondary 
oscillations of the embedded layers in each holon. The 'interactions' 
of physics : EM, Strong and weak forces are different expressions of 
this local friction. How we call them depends of the type of sensors 
with which we observe them. Thus their capacity to resonate with the 
event.

We see here also that local friction (in monads and between monads) 
will also influence the dynamics of total membrane, like the motion of 
the membrane will also influences the monads. A double feedback system. 
Cf. a double pendulum. That leads us to the creation of life. We live - 
and have internal circulation - by the dynamics of the total system.

>From there you can explain in your way the further building up of 
reality based on Electricity, and an Electric Sun is very well possible 
and more logic.

On the website http://www.josephnewman.com refers to JAMES CLERK 
MAXWELL's quote: "In speaking of the Energy of the field, however, I 
wish to be understood literally. All energy is the same as mechanical 
energy, whether it exists in the form of motion or in that of 
elasticity, or in any other form. The energy in electromagnetic 
phenomena is mechanical energy."
(there is no source mentioned).

Maxwellian charge and current 
(http://www.victorianweb.org/science/maxwell.html)

Quote: In modern electromagnetic theory, charge is the source of 
electric fields, and current is the source of the magnetic fields. In 
Maxwellian theory, by contrast, charge is produced by the electric 
field as a result of what was known as "displacement" (of which more 
anon). As Maxwell and his contemporaries understood it, charge did not 
provoke an image of a substance; it was not a "stuff."

Moreover, current, in the usual sense of the rate of change of charge 
over time, was related only indirectly to the magnetic field at this 
time. As historian Jed Buchwald has demonstrated, in Maxwellian theory 
"a current is not a substance to be acted upon; it is merely a 
condition to be changed." That is, current was not considered as a flow 
of charged particles, but as a series of chargings and dischargings. 
Maxwellians interpreted these chargings and dischargings as the growth 
and decay of "displacement," that is, the shift in location of some 
"incompressible substance" (such as the ether) whose very shifting 
endows it with a potential energy. If nothing happens to change this 
potential energy, Maxwellians reason that it will simply dissipate, 
lost as material heat. This loss results in an inequality of 
displacement values (between say, one charged surface and another, 
uncharged one) that engenders to a discontinuity between the two 
regions. The magnitude of this discontinuity is the charge.(end of 
quote).
---
Such a displacement can be seen as the local excitation of the 
membranes of the holon (monad) that will conduct the excess of these 
oscillations over it's parent membranes to other distance holons.
Zero-point? On any spot of the membrane - when the correct oscillations 
are available - holons can be created.

Leon, I just finished a new webpage on the Yin-Yang system, explained 
with this membrane approach. You will see that a 3D-concept + Time 
(dynamics) explain all this. We don't need a Klein-Bottle. 
http://mu6.com/yin-yang.html .

Kind regards,

Dirk

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]