Theos-Talk Archives (January 2004 Message tt00120)

Hello everyone,

Referring to the HPB quote and the article below:

How about that? Looks like they are almost getting close to my ABC theory 
(which was almost presaged by HPB and pretty much consistent with everything she 
taught). 
   
But they still haven't figured out how all those electrical fields come into 
being. Or, more importantly, how they relate to consciousness and give rise 
to mind, memory -- and brains (not to mention, bodies:-)? Be nice if the 
cosmologists and string theorists get together... (And then ask me [or HPB]to fill 
in the links to the missing zero-points of pure consciousness between the em 
fields and the strings.:-)  

In any event, the "Big Bang" may still be a viable concept -- so long as we 
realize it may just be the apparently singular instant at the beginning of (our 
sidereal) time when the universe fell into matter and changed from its 
spiritual (noumenal) to its physical (phenomenal) state. (Of course, in Cosmic 
time, since it also had to evolve through the mental and astral planes, that may 
have taken ages.) Before that sudden appearance in our sidereal space-time 
level, the numbers, spatial directions, frequencies, and time relationshipsused 
for scientific measurement in our visible metric universe, would have no 
reality.  

So, as far as science is concerned, that's where everything appeared to begin 
-- all at once. Because of that, somebody, said it seems like an explosion, 
so they gave it the name "Big Bang," and it stuck. But, then, a lightning 
bolt seems like an explosion to us, and that's an electrical effect, too, that 
has a finite velocity of propagation. Between those last two states is where 
modern science (that tries to imagine the whole by examining all the parts and 
figuring how they interrelate) gets lost in space. 

One problem, besides getting hooked on the particles as being fundamental 
(rather than the wave) is that they don't yet fully understand the fundamental 
electrical nature of the material universe that must originate in the abstract 
motion (superspin or spinergy) of the nonmaterial energy source behind their 
"Big Bang." And, that spin must lead to cycles, and cycles lead to waves, and 
waves have to flow like electricity and obey all the same laws of 
electrodynamics such as voltage (pressure), amperage (volume), resistance, capacitance, 
inductance, phase, resonance, harmonics, etc., as well as generate wave fronts 
that act as particles that smash into things. (Incidentally, these laws are 
analogously similar to all the laws of hydrodynamics.)  
    
Another problem is that the parts keep shifting around trying to get back to 
that superspin or spinergy (the root of electricity, cycles and periodicity) 
they came from. (All fundamental electrical forces, including gravity, canbe 
both attractive and repulsive depending on the polarity.) So, when science 
gets down to observing the smallest parts (quantum particles), they change their 
motion (energy level) and, consequently, their position just by looking at 
them. Quantum physics thinks that's because these properties are indeterminate 
and subject to statistical probability laws. (But, maybe, those mites know 
what they are doing. :-)  

Actually, these apparent effects may be because we can only observe something 
by reflection. And that means sending out a ray of electromagnetic energy 
(light, electrons, x-rays or otherwise) to bounce off the object. When that 
energetic corpuscle or "inquiray" (sic) wave front has the same energy as the 
small particle (which is also an electrical wave front) the particle reactsby 
moving backward and/or changing its direction of spin -- like a billiard ball 
when tapped with the cue stick. (Since, from a theosophical point of view,the 
observer's consciousness, or consciously directed will or intent which mustbe 
a projection of minute energy, can interfere with the consciousness aspect of 
the quantum particle -- could this be a partial explanation of the mechanisms 
behind some forms of psychic phenomena?)  

So, when we try to locate the position of an electron, we can't determine its 
momentum, and when we try to measure its momentum, we can't determine its 
position. But, to the scientist, that can only mean that the universe is 
governed by probability laws... When, actually, it is governed by the informational 
wave patterns of electrical energy carried by the invisible hyperspace fields 
that exist in the apparently empty space between the zero-point and the quantum 
particle. Science labels this space, the Planck distance, and fills it with 
perturbations or "Cosmic foam" of the "vacuum" -- without really knowing what 
they are talking about. Although, they know from Einstein's theory of 
relativity, that the closer you get to the zero-point the greater the energy, until at 
the zero-point, it approaches infinity (by our measurements). Of course, 
this completely violates all the rules of quantum physics, since its mathematics 
can only deal with finite particles having finite energies. So, what to do?  
Science needs a new paradigm that can bring these two theories into 
conformance with each other. Well, that's what string physics is all about.   

So, the more advanced Superstring/M-brane theorists are beginning to see that 
these vibrational patterns on the one dimensional ray of energy 
("superstring") that composes the surface ("M-brane") of the adjacent zero-point hyperspace 
fields (theosophically, the Astral realms linked to the mental realms), are 
what determine the vibrational nature of the 2-dimensional "strings" that 
compose the quarks and gluons that make up the 3-dimensional quantum particles.  
>From there on, electrodynamics takes over and determines the nature of the atoms 
and molecules, and eventually, all the beings in the universe -- from viruses 
to stars, quasars and black holes. A process -- starting from zero, and 
ending up with our space time continuum -- that is as simple as ABC. (That is, if 
you look at it simultaneously from both the inside out AND the outside in.)  

And, it will become so simple when these scientists begin to understand how 
zero-point consciousness (awareness and will) is physiologically, chemically, 
neurological, and psychologically linked to all those material entities through 
their coenergetic hyperspace electrical fields.  

Thus, such a new paradigm will eventually -- by tying together and 
correlating holographic information theory with Superstring/M-brane physicsand its 
hyperspace fields (matter) married to consciousness (spirit) which, together, 
originate simultaneously at the cosmic field's zero-laya-point center -- give us a 
Unified Field Theory of Everything. Incidentally, that is what the 
theosophical and scientifically metaphysical theory of ABC has already done... 
Although, conventional science, steeped in its materialistic biases, is notyet ready 
to fully comprehend or accept it.

But, when they do, which, as HPB predicted, is inevitable, theosophy will no 
longer stand outside of established science, but will merge with it. And, 
from then on, no one will be able to refute the reality of both karma and reincarn
ation and the unity of all beings, along with the moral-ethical 
responsibilities to each other that they imply. 
    
But, didn't we theosophists already know that everything in the universe is 
conscious -- to one degree of expression or another -- and, that consciousness 
is eternal?  

How could that not be -- since the zero-point center of the universe is 
everywhere, while it's circumference, being the continuous interconnected surfaces 
(or M-branes) of all the coadunate but not consubstantial and multidimensional 
hyperspace electrical fields, is nowhere? And, further, while the fields are 
forever changing, the zero-point (that is their origin) can never change its 
essential "beness," or potential being. 

To visualize (by using our imagination focussed meditatively in the higher 
mind) how these fields at the primal beginning are, (1) derived out of a 
centralized zero (Laya) point of infinite spinergy, (2) coenergetically interrelated 
with each other in their spiral involution's, (3) have no beginning or end 
(like a snake with its tail in its mouth), (4) follow a continuous spiral 
vortical path that has no separate inside or outside (like a Mobius strip or Klein 
bottle), and (5) simulates the analogous paths as well as the topological 
molecular code of the eventual DNA molecule -- to finally form 14 inner spherical 
fields within the outer ring-pass-not field (in accord with the formula in the 
Book of Dzyan, "The 3, the 1, the 4, the 1, the 5, the twice 7, the sum total," 
and the ancient concept, "As above so below") -- see the following web sites:
http://users.aol.com/uniwldarts/uniworld.artisans.guild/chakrafield.html
http://users.aol.com/leonmaurer/invlutionflddiagnotate.gif
http://users.aol.com/leonmaurer/Invlutionfldmirror2.gif

[Note that these diagrams are only symbolic, since they try to describe a 
multidimensional reality in only 2-dimensions. So, don't get caught in the 
linear diagrams, themselves, but visualize the "fields of consciousness" as 
transparent spheres within spheres within spheres, etc., with the lines of force 
wound around their surfaces and through all their zero-point centers and tangent 
points in intertwining spirals, like balls of yarn -- with all their beginnings 
and ends tied together.]

Lenny

For an overall picture of the ABC concept, see"
http://tellworld.com/Astro.Biological.Coenergetics 


In a message dated 01/06/04 9:56:23 AM, ultinla@juno.com writes:

>“Water,” and the “water of life” are all, on our plane, the progeny; or
>as a modern physicist would say, the correlations of ELECTRICITY. Mighty
>word, and a still mightier symbol! Sacred generator of a no less sacred
>progeny; of fire — the creator, the preserver and the destroyer; of light
>— the essence of our divine ancestors; of flame—the Soul of things. 
>Electricity, the ONE Life at the upper rung of Being, and Astral Fluid,
>the Athanor of the Alchemists, at its lowest; GOD and DEVIL, GOOD and
>EVIL. — SD I, 81
>
>================================================
>
>There is a revolution just beginning in astronomy/cosmology that will
>rival the one set off by Copernicus and Galileo. This revolution is
>based on the growing realization that the cosmos is highly electrical in
>nature. It is becoming clear that 99% of the universe is made up not of
>"invisible matter", but rather, of matter in the plasma state. 
>Electrodynamic forces in electric plasmas are much stronger than the
>gravitational force. 
> Mainstream astrophysicists are continually “surprised”by new data
>sent back by space probes and orbiting telescopes. New information
>always sends theoretical astrophysicists "back to the drawing board". 
>In light of this, it is curious that they have such "cock-sure" attitudes
>about the infallibility of their present models. Those models seem to
>require major "patching up" every time a new space probe sends back data.
> Astrophysicists and astronomers do not study experimental plasma
>dynamics in graduate school. They rarely take any courses in
>electrodynamic field theory, and thus they try to explain every new
>discovery via gravity, magnetism, and fluid dynamics which is all they
>understand. It is no wonder they cannot understand that 99% of all
>cosmic phenomena are due to plasma dynamics and not to gravity alone. 
> When confronted by observations that cast doubt on the validity of
>their theories, astrophysicistss have conjured up pseudo-scientific
>invisible entities such as neutron stars, weakly interacting massive
>particles, strange energy, and black holes. When confronted by solid
>evidence such as Halton Arp's photographs that contradict the Big Bang
>Theory, their response is to refuse him access to any major telescope in
>the U.S. 
> Instead of wasting time in a futile battle trying to convince
>entrenched mainstream astronomers to seriously investigate the
>Electric/Plasma Universe ideas, a growing band of plasma scientists and
>engineers are simply bypassing them. A new electric plasma-based
>paradigm that does not find new discoveries to be “enigmatic and
>puzzling”, but rather to be predictable and consistent with an electrical
>point of view, is slowly but surely replacing the old paradigm wherein
>all electrical mechanisms are ignored. 
> An electrical "plasma" is a cloud of ions and electrons that, under the
>excitation of applied electrical and magnetic fields, can sometimes light
>up and behave in some unusual ways. The most familiar examples of
>electrical plasmas are the neon sign, lightning, and the electric arc
>welding machine. The ionosphere of Earth is an example of a plasma that
>does not emit visible light. Plasma permeates the space that contains
>our solar system. The cloud of particles that constitutes the solar
>"wind" is a plasma. Our entire "Milky Way" galaxy consists mainly of
>plasma. In fact 99% of the entire universe is plasma! 
>History
> During the late 1800's in Norway, physicist Kristian Birkeland explained
>that the reason we could see the auroras was that they were plasmas. 
>Birkeland also discovered the twisted corkscrew shaped paths taken by
>electric currents when they exist in plasmas. Sometimes those twisted
>shapes are visible and sometimes not - it depends on the strength of the
>current density being carried by the plasma. Today these streams of ions
>and electrons are called "Birkeland Currents". The mysterious "sprites",
>"elves", and "blue jets" associated with electrical storms on Earth are
>examples of Birkeland currents in the plasma of our upper atmosphere.
>In the early 20th century, Nobel laureat Irving Langmuir studied electric
>plasmas in his laboratory at General Electric; he further developed the
>body of knowledge Birkeland had initiated. In fact it was he who first
>used the name "plasma" to describe the almost lifelike, self-organizing
>behavior of these ionized gas clouds in the presence of electrical
>currents and magnetic fields. 
>Basic Properties
>Modes of Operation
> T Currents in Cosmic Sized Plasmas
>Because plasmas are good (but not perfect) conductors, they are
>equivalent to wires in their ability to carry electrical current. It is
>well known that if any conductor cuts through a magnetic field, a current
>will be caused to flow in that conductor. This is how electric
>generators and alternators work. Therefore, if there is any relative
>motion between a cosmic plasma, say in the arm of a galaxy, and a
>magnetic field in that same location, Birkeland currents will flow in the
>plasma. These currents will, in turn, produce their own magnetic fields.
>
>Plasma phenomena are scalable. That is to say, their electrical and
>physical properties remain the same, independent of the size of the
>plasma. Of course dynamic phenomena take much less time to occur in a
>small laboratory plasma than they do in a plasma the size, say, of a
>galaxy. But the phenomena are identical in that they obey the same laws
>of physics. So we can make accurate models of cosmic sized plasmas in
>the lab - and generate effects exactly like those seen in space. In
>fact, electric currents, flowing in plasmas, have been shown to produce
>most of the observed astronomical phenomena that are inexplicable if we
>assume that the only forces at work in the cosmos are magnetism and
>gravity. 
>
> ====================
>
>If this is true the current cosmological speculations --- not just the
>big bang, but many others related theories go into the trash can. What
>does the group think???
>jw
>
>