Theos-Talk Archives (December 2003 Message tt00081)

Forget Alice Bailey. Go straight into a study of HPB's Secret Doctrine. It =
will 
knock your socks off. Not only because it's one of the weirdest, crazy scie=
nce 
fiction that you will ever get your hands on, but also because it all RINGS=
 
TRUE! 

Much of Bailey's work has not stood the test of time and has been proven to=
 
have errors. Meanwhile, the Secret Doctrine seems to get more and more 
verified with each new scientific and historic discovery. It can only be th=
e work 
of Masters.

Strange that so few people study it but study almost everything in the worl=
d that 
has been influenced by it!

--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "netemara888" <netemara888@y...> 
wrote:
> --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Morten Nymann Olesen" <global-
> theosophy@a...> wrote:
> > Hallo Christina and all of you,
> > 
> > My views are:
> > This link http://www.serve.com/herrmann/bailey.htm (use a 
> small "b" in
> > Bailey)
> > 
> > Has as I see it the problem, that it concludes that the Muslims 
> will
> > gladly follow these Bailey teachings - as if they have found a new 
> Bible.
> > I think this is wrong.
> > There are way to few Muslims in any Bailey group as far as I am 
> aware of.
> > The reason is simply this:
> > "We have heard that Brahmanism is the last great religion which 
> arose under
> > first ray influence; we do not know what may have been the 
> religion which
> > was the outcome of the last second ray period; but the Chaldean, 
> the
> > Egyptian and the Zoroastrian religions may be taken as 
> representing the
> > third, the fourth, and the fifth rays respectively. Christianity 
> and
> > probably Buddhism were the result of sixth ray influence. 
> Mohammedanism,
> > which numbers so large a following, is also under sixth ray 
> influence, but
> > it is not a great root religion, being a hybrid offshoot of 
> Christianity
> > with the tinge of Judaism."
> > Esoteric Psychology vol1., page 167-8.
> 
> Morten,
> Actually it is a growing group as we speak. There is one group, 
> which most people dismiss as being part of the Islamic world being 
> the black muslims and the black hebrews. Both started in Chicago, 
> Illinois. I can write a book on how vegetarianism began in Chicago 
> among middle-class African-Americans who also changed the way we all 
> dress now! They and many other minorities are reading the AAB books 
> on the bus while going to work, this is what you don't know. There 
> is a revolution out there against the status quo and people are 
> looking for the most revolutionary books they can find. Tupac (the 
> dead rapper) was introduced to the Bailey books by a Jewish woman 
> who became his mentor. He even named his posthumous album (soon to 
> be released) after the books it is called: "Resurrection." 
> 
> This my friend is only a drop in the bucket. When their power being 
> of light or darkness satanic or the light of the Christ is felt it 
> will be part of the raising of the kundalini on a global level, 
> which is already being experienced. The music that is made is part 
> of this process. There are some psychic things coming which are 
> going to really shock some people. It is part of evolution, what 
> else? But the fundamentalist Christians are going to call all of it 
> part of the Anti-Christ. Can we blame someone (whom St. Paul says is 
> a spirit and not a person) for everything that goes wrong on earth? 
> Cooooomme on.....
> 
> Netemara
> 
> 
> > 
> > --- The message basically read like this: No support for the hybrid
> > offshoots ---
> > --- And what happens to the Middle east these days ? ---
> > --- What level of influence has the Great Invocation á la Bailey 
> kind ---
> > --- upon the millions of "hybrid offshoots" in the Middle 
> East ??? ---
> > 
> > I find these sentences by Alice A. Bailey highly problematic if 
> not just
> > plainly bad.
> > 
> > from
> > M. Sufilight with peace and love...
> > 
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "christinaleestemaker" <christinaleestemaker@y...>
> > To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2003 11:00 AM
> > Subject: Theos-World Re: It's not who in 1975, but what
> > 
> > 
> > > Hallo there,
> > > Look at http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/NewAge/Alice-Bailey.htm
> > > and
> > > http://www.serve.com/herrmann/Bailey.htm
> > >
> > > and you see enough.
> > > Bye Christina
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "netemara888" 
> <netemara888@y...>
> > > wrote:
> > > > DK takes great pains to describe that there will be 
> breakthroughs
> > > > beginning in 1975 which will comprise the next generation of
> > > > spiritual teachings. It will not happen in that year, but is a 
> long
> > > > process which will begin in 1975. One thing which began is a 
> type
> > > of
> > > > psychic opening to greater spiritual channels. These channels 
> are
> > > > the who. I don't mean channeling a master or that but spiritual
> > > > channels which will be open on the inside of each aspirant who 
> is
> > > > nearing the final-four lives.
> > > >
> > > > Yes, just as RS talks about the last four lives which will 
> come as
> > > a
> > > > culmination of long lives past spent in meditation so does DK. 
> So
> > > > what we will be experiencing, reading about, seeking will be 
> that
> > > > opening wider of the door between the Hierarchy and Humanity. 
> And
> > > > where will it manifest? I believe that it will manifest in a 
> series
> > > > of revelations (as AAB describes) but they will be about the 
> higher
> > > > realms of meditation and its fruits. That is my take on the 
> subject.
> > > >
> > > > Namaste
> > > >
> > > > Netemara
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >