re Theosophy, anomalies, part 3
Nov 23, 2003 01:23 PM
by Mauri
<<Mauri, Thanks for your response, as always.
I need to clarify to you my use of the term
"Gnomon," I use the word in the sense of a
Sundial that has a central Pylon vertical at
the center and as a result casts a shadow
caused by the Suns light, the shadow is cast
and moves on the Dial surface and "indicates"
the time of day. I am not intending any other
form such as "Gnosis" or a person's knowledge
or deficiency of knowledge. I only used the
term as a tool meaning "Indicator" which
distinguishes between Light and Darkness,
Primary and Secondary, Original Nature and
Corporeal Carnate Nature as a Metaphor. >>
Me too, basically, in a sense, I think ...
<<But, I do agree that we are all Gnomons or
indicators as we are all at
this level unique differentiation's and human
beings , "Seekers" if you will, or we
would not be on this list.>>
Me to basically, in a sense, I think ...
<<The True and the Secondary are not a
representation or assessment of any one in
particular, but are only referencing a
Metaphysical Reality on the scale of
magnitude of the Creation in which we find
our common participation as per Dallas's post
today on the Globes and Rounds. Like I
said, Karma has a Habitation, which means a
definite locality of manifestation. It can
only have activity or process when a Creation
is in manifestation and that is what I call
the Secondary.>>
Okay, me too, that about "True and
Secondary," but I think I also had in mind
(what might be seen as ...) an "extension, or
sorts" (well, speculatively speaking, hence
the quotes) of such a definition in some
"more individual sense" that, at the same
time, might be seen, (by some?), to serve
double duty, in a sense, to an extent, in
whatever "Broader context," say ... Not that
we might not all have our own various
definitions for "True and Secondary" in
whatever sense, context.
<<The premise is that the Absolute
is Absolute by definition and remains
unchanged and unmarked and not beholden to
Karma. Our Original Nature which is in the
Absolute is unmarked and unstained and
in terms of the Absolute and Unity has never
moved and never departed. So
on the scale of magnitude of our
individuality here we are two realities, one
awake in the Light, the other asleep in the
Darkness as the Gnostic would say. So there
is neither departing or arriving and "Lila"
is the word used in India to communicate this
overall condition or process and translates
as "sport" referencing Vishnu as Creator that
in his sleep dreams the Universes. This only
is a metaphor to indicate the
Mayavic reality when creation (the
secondary) is referenced to the Primary, the
Absolute. John >>>
For whatever reason, I seem to find myself
basically agreeing with you, in a sense, to
some extent, apparently ... Why? Hmm ... I
don't seem to "know enough about that,"
exactly. On the other hand, if "agreeing" is
basically just as "karmic/mayavic" as
"disagreeing"... ^:-/ Not that ...
Speculatively,
Mauri
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application