theos-talk.com

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

re to Morten re "assuming,," "speculation," "facts " and ...

Oct 24, 2003 12:48 PM
by Mauri


Morten wrote: <<But I don't assume. We talk about facts here.>>

It's interesting, if from my speculative perspective, that you use the word "facts, " but don't offer much in the way of whatever you might tend to see as somewhat more-specific qualifiers as to the sense in which you're using that word, in that, after all, in the context of anything like the "Esoteric Tradition" (which might be seen to have some kind of relevance on a Theosophic discussion list, possibly ...), one might wonder about a few "apparently relevant qualifers," say, that might be seen to have some kind of relevance in whatever "factual" and/or "speculative sense" ... ^:-/ ...

<<To speculate is ALSO to assume.>>

So ... ^:-/ ...

<<This is a fact - but of course not always a fact. If you disagree, then you are twisting the english language.>>

As I see it, in as much as one acknowledges, by way of however defined "speculative, "assumptive," or "factual" basis, that one's thinking processes, in general, in terms of karmic, dependent arisings, are essentially mayavic, then, as I see it, in that sense, all "facts" are seen as "esentially relative," and, in that sense, are, in essence, tantamount to being "essentially speculative," in that they are, (per their karmic promptings, in keeping with their dependent arisings), the individualistic/collective "interpretive," modelistic, mediumistic coping mechanisms that, in turn (in terms of their mayavicity), are to be transcended if one is to experience enlightenment. That is, not that there not plenty of "useful models and information," (that might be seen as "factual enough," say), but/"but" ... Or is that kind of reasoning too "circular" for you, as Leon might put it?

<<Yes. But maybe if you were to do - more - than just speculating about it,
you might put your HEART into the banging instead of only your HEAD !
(smile...)>>

More? Sorry, but seems to me that I have already made use of all the hearts that I can think/speculate heartfully about, and if that isn't enough ... Maybe if I were to start getting something out of some of my other organs ... ^:-/ ... or maybe that wouldn't be kosher, or something ...

<<I think you are doing - aeeehm... - fine on not being selfcentered.
Keep up the good work using your Heart in the matter.>>

Aeeehm ... ^:-/...sorry about whatever "less applicable" forms of "selfcenterdness" I might be prone to in spite of my speculative attempts to "heart over" such tendencies ... And sorry about confusedly scratching my head so often in public. But, not to worry, I still have lots of hair left over. And ...

Speculatively,
Mauri












[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application